Skip to content

· Private foundation

Parker Madison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$30kHealth$12kArts & Culture$11kCrime & Legal$10kEducation$8kRecreation & Sports$7kReligion$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$412
Median grant
1
States reached
$44
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE KENNY & MELISSA COMSTOCK FOUNDA$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,100
LIVE LIKE RILEY FOUNDATION$412
CROSSROADS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$383
COMPASS ACADEMY$242
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $150 → 10%ODESSA DAY NURSERY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 14 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$62k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+42%

Still filing today

21%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CRISIS CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
  • TK
    THE KENNY & MELISSA COMSTOCK FOUNDA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k
  • CA
    COMPASS ACADEMY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $7k

Funded once

  • HH
    HARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CO
    CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
2
Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

—
3
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
5
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding the Lone Star Llc

Uniting volunteers to prepare meals that get delivered to the food insecure

Food & Nutrition
7
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
8
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
9
Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
12
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Texas Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CRISIS CENTER: $18,369 · OtherTHE CRISIS CENTERTHE KENNY & MELISSA COMSTOCK FOUNDA: $10,500 · OtherTHE KENNY & MELISSA COMSTOCK FOUNDAHARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CE: $10,000 · OtherHARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CECOMPASS ACADEMY: $7,080 · OtherCOMPASS ACADEMYTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $4,970 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYCROSSROADS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $4,781 · OtherCROSSROADS FELLOWSHIP CHURCHBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $2,500 · Other+15 more: $8,337 · Other+15 moreCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF GRAY…Live Like Rylee Foundation: $3,673 · HealthAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $1,700 · EducationODESSA DAY NURSERY: $1,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $150 · Human ServicesCollege Golf Fellowship: $750 · Religion
Other$72,037Civil Rights$10,000Health$3,673Education$1,700Human Services$1,150Religion$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLive Like Rylee Foundation: $3,673 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetODESSA DAY NURSERY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Live Like Rylee Foundation ↗
  • Who funds APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ODESSA DAY NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parker Madison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parker Madison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Parker Madison Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Parker Madison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parker Madison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph