· Public charity
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation Foundation
To support and benefit the parker jewish institute for health care and rehabilitation and any supporting organization operating for its benefit.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $4,057,690 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,151,333 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $93,643 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $250k+1 grant · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION | $4,000,000 |
| INDIA HOME INC | $26,500 |
| BAYSIDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $18,800 |
| ASSOCIATION OF OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES | $7,090 |
| VOICES FOR TRUTH AND HUMANITY | $5,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PJPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION6× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +40%
- BHBAYSIDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY2× · 2022–2023 · $29k · revenue +620%
- NNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- HUHOFSTRA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +23%
- NYNEW YORK BOARD OF RABBIS INCone grant, 2018 · $10k
- NWNYU WINTHROP HOSPITALone grant, 2018 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.
Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…
Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…
To provide long term residential healthcare, short term rehab, assisted living, and alzheimer's care for older adults.
Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…
Operating as menorah center for rehabilitation and nursing care, menorah is a 436-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of mjhs health system. menorah is committed to providing exceptional sub-acute rehabilitation services and…
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.
The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…
To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rosalind and Joseph Gurwin Jewish Geriatric Center of Long Island Inc and the most unlike its peers is Voices for Truth and Humanity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION ↗
- Who funds INDIA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BAYSIDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NYU WINTHROP HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds METHODIST CHURCH HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR TRUTH AND HUMANITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.