Skip to content
Park Bixby Tower Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Park Bixby Tower Inc

The organization's mission is to conduct those activities that benefit the elderly, which include providing housing and other services designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.2MFood & Nutrition$339kArts & Culture$136kHealth$92kInternational$50kEducation$50kHuman Services$42kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $214,753, the rows itemized in this filing. The $224,753 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $127k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS$126,753
LONG BEACH HERITAGE - BEMBRIDGE HOUSE$16,000
CHRISTIAN OUTREACH IN ACTION$12,500
WILLMORE CITY HERITAGE ASSOC$10,000
CARE CLOSET LBC$10,000
INTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE$10,000
OSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE$9,000
THE ROCK CLUB MUSIC IS THE REMEDY$7,500
GOLDEN WEST POPS$7,000
LONG BEACH BLUES SOCIETY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARE CLOSET LBC: $10k → 14%CARE CLOSET LBC: $10k → 14%CARE CLOSET LBC: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$679k · 12 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$679k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+73%

Still filing today

92%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Meals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $318k · revenue +1%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +35%
  • AO
    ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • F
    FAMCO
    5× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue -48% · 72% of their budget
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +167%
  • TA
    THE AIDS FOOD STORE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
We Love Long Beach

We Love Long Beach's mission is to inspire and equip neighbors towards helping eachother and the city of Long Beach flourish. They work towards reaching this goal by connecting neighbors, one block at a time.

Community Improvement
2
Long Beach Community Players Inc

To celebrate the human experience while encouraging the participation of artist and audience in theatre productions.

Arts & Culture
3
Laguna Beach Cultural Arts Center

LB Cultural Arts Center provides a creative epicenter through exhibition space events and promotion to support artists in the following mediums: visual arts music video and still photography film dance prose and poetry and arts education.

Arts & Culture
4
Long Beach Opera

Engaging people through provocative meaningful experiences that challenge, connect and inspire. long beach opera produces operas in performing arts venues in long beach and regionally, and produces opera for youth in schools.

Arts & Culture
5
Camerata Singers of Long Beach

Dedicated to excellence in choral music, we enrich the lives of our communities and performers through a broad spectrum of repertoire, innovative programming and arts education.

Arts & Culture
6
Long Beach Merchants Association

Sponsoring and organizing several local festivals throughout the year to attract tourism and shopping

—
7
Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is the platform for business to provide leadership, education and advocacy so that the Long Beach area thrives in the 21st century.

—
8
The Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra Society Inc

The orchestra pursues its mission, "to enrich and connect our community through intimate and transformative musical experiences which exemplify and foster artistic excellence, education and innovation," through the blend of traditional…

Arts & Culture
9
Festival of Arts of Laguna Beach

To promote, produce, and sponsor events and activities that encourage the appreciation, study and performance of the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Long Beach Food & Beverage

The primary mission is support Long Beach restaurants and chefs.

Food & Nutrition
11
Leadership Long Beach

We are a catalyst that informs, activates, and connects community leaders to more meaningfully serve Long Beach.

—
12
Conservation Corps of Long Beach

To support young adults in realizing their potential through work, service, conservation, and education.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Long Beach Symphony Association; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMCO: $1,064,380 · Housing & ShelterFAMCO+1 more: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterMeals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc: $317,583 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of L…THE AIDS FOOD STORE INC: $11,229 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $4,057 · Food & NutritionWILLMORE CITY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · OtherWILLMORE C…SAN JOAQUIN PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUI…LONG BEACH HERITAGE COALITION: $24,000 · OtherLONG BEACH…Christian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action: $12,500 · OtherChristian …JOCELYN CENTER: $10,000 · OtherJOCELYN CE…THE DKGCA LEARNING IS FOR EVERYONE: $7,000 · OtherGOLDEN WEST POPS: $7,000 · OtherCARE CLOSET LBC: $28,000 · OtherCARE CLOSE…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY …HONOR FLIGHT SOUTHLAND: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $10,152 · Other+3 moreCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $104,486 · EducationINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE: $27,500 · Arts & CultureThe Rock Club- Music is the Remedy: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLONG BEACH BLUES SOCIETY: $12,000 · Arts & CultureLong Beach Symphony Association: $8,910 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $60,000 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · International
Housing & Shelter$1,070,880Food & Nutrition$332,869Other$179,652Education$104,486Arts & Culture$86,910Health$60,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMCO: $1,064,380 over 5y, 72% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc: $317,583 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $104,486 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLMORE CITY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetCARE CLOSET LBC: $28,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE: $27,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Rock Club- Music is the Remedy: $25,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLONG BEACH HERITAGE COALITION: $24,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetChristian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action: $12,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE AIDS FOOD STORE INC: $11,229 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach Symphony Association: $8,910 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORONA COMMUNITY VILLAS INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT SOUTHLAND: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLONG BEACH ORGANIC INC: $5,764 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach Community Table: $4,057 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMusique Sur La Mer Orchestras Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Public Corp for the A…Bess J Hodges Foundat…The Rudolph J & Daphn…Archstone FoundationEarl B & Loraine H Mi…California Community …Long Beach Community …Farmers & Merchants B…The RuMBa Foundation …The Josephine S Gumbi…Sempra FoundationWeingart Foundation
Public Corp for the Arts of the City of Long BeachCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Public Corp for the Arts of the City of Long Beach · Bess J Hodges Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · Archstone Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · California Community Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · The RuMBa Foundation of Long Beach · The Josephine S Gumbiner Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Weingart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Park Bixby Tower Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park Bixby Tower Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Park Bixby Tower Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Park Bixby Tower Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Park Bixby Tower’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home