Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pape Foundation Ima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$313kArts & Culture$28kYouth Development$20kEnvironment$5kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$1k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$630k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC$20,000
ZACHARY SCOTT THEATER CENTER$19,200
AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE$5,000
THE TRAIL CONSERVANCY$5,000
UMLAUF SCULPTURE GARDEN & MUSEUM$2,500
WINE AND FOOD FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$2,000
4 ATX FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WINE AND FOOD FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $2k → 10%COMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST: $313k → 14%THE TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $5k → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%ZACHARY SCOTT THEATER CENTER: $19k → 10%UMLAUF SCULPTURE GARDEN & MUSEUM: $3k → 10%WESTLAKE CHAP CLUB: $1k → 10%4 ATX FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Austin Area Commission for the Arts Inc

Austin area arts applauds and advances all arts by welcoming diverse, creative individuals to share their unique talents to inspire our community.

Philanthropy
2
Austin City Art Fund

To support the production and exhibition of art and film

Arts & Culture
3
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
4
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
5
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
6
Austin Creative Reuse

Fostering conservation and reuse through creativity, education, and community building.

Human Services
7
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
8
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
9
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
10
The University of Texas Foundation No 1

To support the university of texas system

11
Texas a&M-Corpus Christi Foundation

For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi

Education
12
Texas Cultural Trust Council

Public arts funding

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Theatre Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Comerica Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST — $312,860 · PhilanthropyCOMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER — $19,200 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $6,000 · Arts & CultureUMLAUF SCULPTURE GARDEN & MUSEUM — $2,500 · Arts & CultureANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Trail Conservancy — $5,000 · EnvironmentEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT — $1,200 · EducationWESTLAKE CHAP CLUB INC — $1,000 · Education4ATX FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$314,860Arts & Culture$27,700Youth Development$20,000Environment$5,000Education$2,200Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST — $312,860 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINE & FOOD FOUNDATION OF TEXAS — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTLAKE CHAP CLUB INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Better Business Bureau · Texas Instruments Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ibm International Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pape Foundation Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph