Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paloian Family Foundation Inc

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$255kYouth Development$29kEducation$28kPhilanthropy$27kHuman Services$7kReligion$6kHousing & Shelter$5kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLBE CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
THE DANNY WALLACE FOUNDATION INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100 → 17%LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICE: $500 → 9%HALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1k → 9%HALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
AZ
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$326k · 15 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
38

Total granted

$326k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+37%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $235k · revenue +66%
  • HN
    HALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +59%
  • TB
    THE BROOKLAWN COUNTRY CLUB INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2023 · $644 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • KC
    KOLBE CATHEDRAL HIGH SHCOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
6
Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative

The mission of quantum leap healthcare collarborative is to provide management and financial support to healthcare research organizations, particularly involving breast cancer research and treatment.

Human Services
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Harold E Eisenberg Foundation

The foundation's objective is to fund breakthrough gastrointestinal (gi) cancer research, including clinical trials and studies, at the robert h. lurie comprehensive cancer center of northwestern university.additionally, another objective…

Philanthropy
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $234,760 · HealthBRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $1,012 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $19,196 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAKEMAN BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $17,400 · OtherWAKEMAN BOYS GIRLS CLUBKOLBE CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherKOLBE CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOLNORMA F PFREIM BREAST CANCER CENTER: $13,095 · OtherNORMA F PFREIM BREAST CANCER C…Individual grant recipient: $5,333 · OtherKOLBE CATHEDRAL HIGH SHCOOL: $5,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY: $5,000 · OtherFAIRFIELD POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIA: $3,600 · Other+32 more: $21,799 · Other+32 moreInland Empire Community Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropyDANNY WALLACE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyWAKEMAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB CORP: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EDUCATION FUND INC F/K/A DADE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND IN: $5,000 · EducationSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $850 · EducationOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $5,200 · Housing & ShelterMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,548 · Human ServicesHALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Health$235,772Other$105,423Philanthropy$27,000Youth Development$9,500Education$5,850Housing & Shelter$5,200Human Services$4,648

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $234,760 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAKEMAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB CORP: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDUCATION FUND INC F/K/A DADE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND IN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,548 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY WALLACE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetHALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLAWN COUNTRY CLUB INCORPORATED: $644 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRE VELO: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRichard Henry Lee PTA: $206 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WAKEMAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB CORP ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATION FUND INC F/K/A DADE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND IN ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANNY WALLACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLAWN COUNTRY CLUB INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FIRE VELO ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Estate of Benjamin B LewisCT15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Estate of Benjamin B Lewis · Tauck Family Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paloian Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paloian Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Hall Neighborhood House Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Wakeman Boys and Girls Club Corp: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
  • The Education Fund Inc F/K/a Dade Public Education Fund in: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paloian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph