Skip to content

· Public charity

Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter

Palmettopride coordinates and implements statewide and local programs for litter control.

$624k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$3.6MAnimals$312kCommunity Improvement$253kPublic Benefit$151kCrime & Legal$144kEmployment$60kArts & Culture$60kEducation$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 43 grants below total $562,504, the rows itemized in this filing. The $624,359 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $61,855 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $400k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEEP THE MIDLANDS BEAUTIFUL$63,531
ENVIRONMENTAL SCULPTURES$35,000
MISC$31,204
KOPIS$29,655
ORANGEBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT$25,000
KEEP JASPER COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$22,500
KEEP AIKEN COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$15,000
KEEP HAMPTON COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$11,775
KEEP NEWBERRY COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$10,000
INDIAN LAND GREEN$10,000
TOWN OF KERSHAW$10,000
KEEP NORTH CHARLESTON BEAUTIFUL$10,000
CITY OF ROCK HILL$10,000
KEEP BERKELEY BEAUTIFUL$10,000
KEEP COLLETON BEAUTIFUL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $10k → 10%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $5k → 10%KEEP BERKELEY BEAUTIFUL: $10k → 9%KEEP BERKELEY BEAUTIFUL: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 76 repeat orgs$716k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
57

Total granted

$4.0M
$597k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+3%

Still filing today

13%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KT
    KEEP THE MIDLANDS BEAUTIFUL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CAROLINA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $145k · revenue +167%
  • OI
    ONESPARTANBURG INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $101k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Mauldin
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CC
    Cherokee County
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CO
    CITY OF GOOSE CREEK
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Columbia Green

Provide funds to help columbia, sc and surrounding areas fill parks, medians, and major gateways with flowers, shrubs and trees.

Environment
3
Pickens County Tourism Association

Tourism and promotion

Arts & Culture
4
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
5
Beckley-Raleigh County Chamber of Commerce

To build a vibrant community through programs of advocacy, public awareness and policy development.

—
6
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
7
Columbia-Marion County Development Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
8
Pamlico Business Resource Center
Community Improvement
9
Clemson Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

Our mission is to deliver invaluable information, outstanding services, and impactful advocacy to members by empowering businesses and individuals and contributing to the prosperity of the clemson area.

—
10
South Carolina Forage and Grazing Lands Coalition

forage and grazing land coalition

—
11
Outer Banks Chamber of Commerce Inc

Empower the Outer Banks business community by promoting and developing economic prosperity.

—
12
Union County Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of Industry/ Business in Union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Fairfield Community Coordinating Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOARD OF VOTER REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $180,204 · OtherCITY OF ROCK HILL: $163,840 · OtherDORCHESTER COUNTY: $162,268 · Other+123 more: $3,627,824 · Other+123 moreKEEP THE MIDLANDS BEAUTIFUL: $246,721 · EnvironmentINDIAN LAND GREEN: $20,000 · EnvironmentKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $16,500 · Environment+3 more: $21,873 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN CAROLINA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $145,000 · Community ImprovementWILLIAMSBURG HOMETOWN CHAMBER: $37,500 · Community ImprovementFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY COORDINATING COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementASCEND PICKENS INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTH CAROLINA LITTER CONTROL: $46,608 · EducationBERKELEY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $15,000 · Human ServicesLAURENS COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $31,415 · PhilanthropySouth Carolina Aquarium: $10,000 · Animals
Other$4,134,136Environment$305,094Community Improvement$202,500Education$46,608Human Services$35,000Philanthropy$31,415Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEEP THE MIDLANDS BEAUTIFUL: $246,721 over 9y, 24% of budgetSOUTHERN CAROLINA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $145,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetONESPARTANBURG INC: $100,640 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA LITTER CONTROL: $46,608 over 4y, 26% of budgetWILLIAMSBURG HOMETOWN CHAMBER: $37,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetLAURENS COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $31,415 over 4y, 14% of budgetINDIAN LAND GREEN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMYRTLE BEACH AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $13,690 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY COORDINATING COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetASCEND PICKENS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMURRELLS INLET 2020 INC: $6,630 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetLAURENS COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPALMETTO TRAIL: $5,243 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEEP THE MIDLANDS BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CAROLINA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ONESPARTANBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA LITTER CONTROL ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSBURG HOMETOWN CHAMBER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Municipal Association of South CarolinaSC36.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Municipal Association of South Carolina · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Keep America Beautiful Inc · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · National Arbor Day Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · South Carolina Humanities Council Inc · American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation · Open Space Institute Land Trust Inc · Central Carolina Economic Development Alliance

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter?

    Find your warmest path to Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph