Skip to content
Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35 at a glance

· Public charity

Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35

To provide support and benefits to its members

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$180kPublic Benefit$127kEmployment$95kYouth Development$50kEducation$40kFood & Nutrition$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $67,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $235,599 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $168,099 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NH AFL-CIO$25,000
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATORS$15,000
UNITE HERE LOCAL 26$10,000
JOYCE CRAIG FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE$10,000
IUPAT$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHELSEA COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 16%CHELSEA COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 16%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 7 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
32

Total granted

$225k
$441k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+54%

Still filing today

71%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HAMPSHIRE AFL-CIO
    3× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +58%
  • MA
    Maine AFL-CIO
    4× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +413%
  • COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BO
    BOSTON OPPORTUNITY IE PAC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CT
    COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • IB
    IUPAT BOLD FUTURE PAC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Afl-Cio Scholarship Corporation
Education
2
Aft Massachusetts

State labor organization

—
3
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union

MCOFU is the state recognized collective bargaining representative for all employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Corrections Unit 4.

Recreation & Sports
4
New England Joint Board Unite Here

To unite all workers for the purpose of collective bargaining throughout the trades and industries within its jurisdiction.

—
5
Western Massachusetts Area Labor Federation

Labor organization

—
6
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
7
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—
8
Boston Teachers Union

Labor union

—
9
Massachusetts and Northern New England Laborers District Council

Membership organization representing approximately 17,000 union members for purposes of collective bargaining.

—
10
The Connecticut Construction Industries Association Inc

All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…

Employment
11
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
12
Bristol Police Union

To protect the rights of its members, bargain collectively, and promote the reputation of the profession of law enforcement.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Labor United Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas S Gunning Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HAMPSHIRE AFL-CIO: $55,000 · OtherNEW HAMPSHIRE AFL-CIOBOSTON OPPORTUNITY IE PAC: $50,000 · OtherBOSTON OPPORTUNITY IE PACMaine AFL-CIO: $50,000 · OtherMaine AFL-CIOCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS: $40,000 · OtherCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTSNEW HAMPSHIRE STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL: $35,000 · OtherNEW HAMPSHIRE STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCILIUPAT BOLD FUTURE PAC: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherJEFFERY SULLIVAN TESTIMONIAL DINNER: $25,000 · OtherCOMMITTE TO ELECT TOM FALTER: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · Other+26 more: $273,825 · Other+26 moreLA COLABORATIVA INC: $20,356 · Human ServicesBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsFINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND: $10,109 · EmploymentIUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL NO 51 LABOR MANAGMENT FUND: $7,500 · EmploymentMASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$624,825Human Services$25,356Civil Rights$25,000Employment$17,609Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE AFL-CIO: $55,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetMaine AFL-CIO: $50,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL: $35,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetCOMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC: $20,356 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING OF MASS: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS STATE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO: $12,275 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND: $10,109 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER BOSTON MASS LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO: $7,450 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE AFL-CIO ↗
  • Who funds Maine AFL-CIO ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING OF MASS ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS STATE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO ↗
  • Who funds FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND ↗
  • Who funds UNITE HERE LOCAL 26 ↗
  • Who funds IUPAT DISTRICT COUNCIL NO 51 LABOR MANAGMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON MASS LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

North Atlantic States…
North Atlantic States Regional Council of CarpentersMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • La Colaborativa Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home