Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Page Hill Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$273kEducation$111kHuman Services$108kFood & Nutrition$29kHealth$29kYouth Development$22kCrime & Legal$20kAnimals$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay$100,000
MORE$30,000
Kiwanis Club of Lady Lake$10,000
Floridas Hometown USA$10,000
HOAA Adoption Services$10,000
Bold Org$8,000
Interfaith Food Pantry$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AFSP$5,000
Dog Breath Foundation$5,000
My Special Place$3,000
Color A Smile$2,000
Special Olympics$1,755
Lions Club Orange Blossom$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Southeastern Guide Dogs: $10k → 10%Visions and Pathways: $5k → 5%Dog Breath Foundation: $5k → 7%Cornerstone Family Programs: $10k → 4%Children On The Green: $7k → 4%Color A Smile: $5k → 4%Color A Smile: $2k → 4%Color A Smile: $2k → 4%Color A Smile: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$385k · 14 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$385k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

29%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Eckerd College
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +17%
  • KC
    Kiwanis Club of Lady Lake
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +20% · 97% of their budget
  • CA
    COLOR A SMILE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • JF
    JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -20%
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +69%
  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
2
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

4
Family Connects International

Family connects international is committed to strengthening bonds for families of newborns and linking them directly to supportive community care resources.

Health
5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

8
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
9
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
10
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
11
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Family Programs and the most unlike its peers is Henrys Loving Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORE — $148,016 · OtherMORECASA — $20,300 · OtherCASAKiwanis Club of Lady Lake — $20,000 · OtherKiwanis Club of Lady LakePeyton Heart Project — $17,175 · OtherPeyton Heart ProjectIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · OtherJump Start — $13,000 · OtherMallorys Army — $12,360 · OtherBold Org — $12,000 · Other+14 more — $62,940 · Other+14 moreNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $170,000 · PhilanthropyNew Hampshire Charitable FoundationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyEckerd College — $75,000 · EducationEckerd CollegeJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $20,000 · EducationJUMPSTART FOR Y…FLORIDA HOMETOWN USA PROGRAM INC — $10,000 · EducationFLORIDA HOMETOW…COLOR A SMILE — $10,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $10,000 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE DOG BREATH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesVISIONS AND PATHWAYS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,200 · Food & NutritionHENRYS LOVING TEAM — $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $5,000 · HealthActive Minds Inc — $500 · HealthHEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $1,755 · Recreation & Sports
Other$320,291Philanthropy$271,000Education$105,000Human Services$50,000Food & Nutrition$24,200Health$11,500International$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,755

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $170,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEckerd College — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $24,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKiwanis Club of Lady Lake — $20,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLOR A SMILE — $10,500 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetFLORIDA HOMETOWN USA PROGRAM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHENRYS LOVING TEAM — $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISIONS AND PATHWAYS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS 4 NEW HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC
  • Who funds Eckerd College
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds Kiwanis Club of Lady Lake
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds COLOR A SMILE
  • Who funds FLORIDA HOMETOWN USA PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
  • Who funds CHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC
  • Who funds HENRYS LOVING TEAM
  • Who funds HEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION
  • Who funds THE DOG BREATH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VISIONS AND PATHWAYS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS 4 NEW HOPE INC
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Page Hill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc40% of income from government
  • Visions and Pathways a Nj Nonprofit Corporation23% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs3% of income from government
  • Children On the Green Inc1% of income from government
  • Eckerd College0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph