Skip to content
Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities

To implement/facilitate school, family, and community partnerships, promoting a safe and drug-free lifestyle for the well-being of all clark county residents.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$1.5MEducation$1.4MHousing & Shelter$376kYouth Development$352kEmployment$224kRecreation & Sports$182k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $201k
$35,670
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$144,738
LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION$56,000
CLARK COUNTY DEPT OF FAMILY SERVICE$48,341
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSOF SOUTHERN NEV$35,670
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS$33,445
HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$15,000
SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT$8,364
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $548k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $25k → 13%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $22k → 13%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $15k → 13%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $15k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $56k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $55k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $45k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $31k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $31k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 13%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $19k → 13%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $10k → 13%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $7k → 13%TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR DOMESTIC CRISIS: $32k → 13%TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR DOMESTIC CRISIS: $18k → 13%TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR D: $15k → 13%SAFE NEST: $31k → 13%SAFE NEST: $25k → 13%TINHIH (NO HERO IN HEROIN): $13k → 13%TINHIH (NO HERO IN HEROIN): $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 22 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$6.0M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+134%

Still filing today

68%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $335k · revenue +7%
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $248k · revenue +79%
  • NP
    NEVADA PARTNERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $224k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BO
    BOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • PC
    PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +134%
  • CO
    CITY OF LAS VEGAS
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth

The organization provides wraparound services to meet homeless youths' immediate, emergency needs and help them transition to long-term self- sufficiency. the organization's support comes primarily from government grants and corporate…

Housing & Shelter
4
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
5
Partnership Carson City

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs,…

Youth Development
6
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
7
Community Action Against Rape

Offering hope, help and healing to those affected by sexual violence and exploitation. making an impact in the core services of: prevention, education, advocacy and counseling.

Crime & Legal
8
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
9
Hopelink of Southern Nevada

Hopelink of southern nevada (hopelink) is a nevada nonprofit organization established in 1991 to provide services throughout clark county. hopelink's mission is to build a better community by preventing homelessness, keeping families…

Housing & Shelter
10
Cplc Nevada Inc

Cplc nevada, inc. is a community development corporation (cdc), committed to building stronger, healthier communities by leading advocate, coalition builder, and direct service provider. (continued on schedule o)cplc nevada, inc. promotes…

Community Improvement
11
Nevada Healthright

Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.

Health
12
New Vista Ranch Inc

New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Recovery Inc; the most unlike its peers is Real Talk Youth Impact Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,378,699 · OtherCLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTCLARK COUNTY NV ELECTION DEPTARMENT #84: $1,102,394 · OtherCLARK COUNTY NV ELECTION DEPTARMENT #84SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT: $797,274 · OtherSOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICTVARIETY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $143,959 · Other+7 more: $441,877 · Other+7 moreFOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY INC: $544,436 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR…BRIDGE COUNSELING ASSOCIATES: $163,952 · HealthBRIDGE COUNSEL…WESTCARE NEVADA INC: $55,841 · HealthWESTCARE NEVAD…+1 more: $16,500 · HealthLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $247,550 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS …SAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR: $121,000 · Human ServicesSAFE NESTT…HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $117,256 · Human ServicesHELP OF SO…LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC: $36,712 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS …THERE IS NO HERO IN HEROIN FOUNDATION: $25,129 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $335,029 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND G…POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $182,451 · Youth DevelopmentPOLICE ATH…+1 more: $16,706 · Youth DevelopmentNEVADA PARTNERS INC: $224,045 · EmploymentUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $92,584 · Education
Other$3,864,203Health$780,729Human Services$547,647Youth Development$534,186Employment$224,045Education$92,584

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY INC: $544,436 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $335,029 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $247,550 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERS INC: $224,045 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $182,451 over 8y, 25% of budgetBRIDGE COUNSELING ASSOCIATES: $163,952 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetVARIETY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $143,959 over 3y, 38% of budgetTHE SHADE TREE INC: $128,105 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR: $121,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $117,256 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $92,584 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCARE NEVADA INC: $55,841 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAID FOR AIDS OF NEVADA (AFAN): $45,475 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC: $36,712 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHERE IS NO HERO IN HEROIN FOUNDATION: $25,129 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetREAL TALK YOUTH IMPACT PROGRAM: $16,706 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetPACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES: $16,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COUNSELING ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SHADE TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTCARE NEVADA INC ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR AIDS OF NEVADA (AFAN) ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds THERE IS NO HERO IN HEROIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REAL TALK YOUTH IMPACT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds PACT COALITION FOR SAFE AND DRUG- FREE COMMUNITIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Souther…Nevada Community Foun…Mgm Resorts FoundationNV Energy Charitable …Canarelli Family Foun…Mondays DarkVegas Golden Knights …Three SquareDignity HealthRaiders Foundation NvRaiders FoundationWynn Resorts Foundati…
United Way of Southern NevadaNV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · Mondays Dark · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Three Square · Dignity Health · Raiders Foundation Nv · Raiders Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities?

    Find your warmest path to Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home