Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Pacific Environmental Coalition

The mission of the organization is to bring about social change and advances in environmental public policy. The organization will promote social and public policy changes that aim to protect wildlife, landscapes and natural resources; empower communities to create sustainable solutions and practices that protect our globe; and foster a…

$11M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$6,700,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 12
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$956k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Pacific Environmental Coalition funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Community ImprovementEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$11M60%
FY20233$500k67%
FY20224$725k25%
FY20215$1.0M100%
FY202012$8.0Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$10MPublic Benefit$9.7MCivil Rights$550kSocial Science$510kHuman Services$500kPhilanthropy$200k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
CA
DE
TN
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated$6,700,00012%
Ff PAC$3,000,0001n/a
Workmoney Inc$1,500,00025%
Acronym$1,500,00018%
Senate Majority PAC$1,250,0002n/a
Silverlining Policy Inc$1,100,0002100%
Defending Democracy Together$1,000,00013%
Republican Accountability PAC Inc$1,000,0001n/a
Environmental Defense Action Fund$775,00032%
Pacific Atlantic Action Coalition$510,0001n/a
Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of Pacific Environmental Coalition by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated$6,700,00012%
Ff PAC$3,000,0001n/a
Workmoney Inc$1,500,00025%
Acronym$1,500,00018%
Senate Majority PAC$1,250,0002n/a
Silverlining Policy Inc$1,100,0002100%
Defending Democracy Together$1,000,00013%
Republican Accountability PAC Inc$1,000,0001n/a
Environmental Defense Action Fund$775,00032%
Pacific Atlantic Action Coalition$510,0001n/a
Americans for Strength and Freedom$500,00017%
Fund for a Better Future Inc$500,00011%
Clearpath Action for Conservative Clean Energy Inc$450,00026%
Center for Voter Information$337,50011%
Votevets PAC$250,0001n/a
Sfa Fund Inc$200,0001n/a
Majority Forward$150,00010%
House Majority Forward$150,00011%
BlueGreen Alliance Inc$100,00012%
Big Tent Project Fund$100,00011%
League of Conservation Voters Inc$100,00010%
Climate Solutions Action Fund Inc$50,0001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($300k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Pacific Environmental Coalition supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 15 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEnvironmental Defense Fund Incorporated: $6,700,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWorkmoney Inc: $1,500,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAcronym: $1,500,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetSilverlining Policy Inc: $1,100,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetDefending Democracy Together: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Action Fund: $775,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAmericans for Strength and Freedom: $500,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFund for a Better Future Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetClearpath Action for Conservative Clean Energy Inc: $450,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCenter for Voter Information: $337,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMajority Forward: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouse Majority Forward: $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBlueGreen Alliance Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBig Tent Project Fund: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLeague of Conservation Voters Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Advocacy Action Fund Inc · Oakw Fund · Bright Future Fund · Impetus Fund · Breakthrough Energy Action Inc · Fund for a Better Future Inc · Future Forward USA Action · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Our American Future Action · America Votes · Hopewell Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Pacific Environmental Coalition with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pacific Environmental Coalition?

Find your warmest path to Pacific Environmental Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Pacific Environmental Coalition

How much does Pacific Environmental Coalition give?
Pacific Environmental Coalition reported 5 grants totaling $11,300,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 12 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Pacific Environmental Coalition fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (47%), Public Benefit (45%), Civil Rights (3%).
Who are Pacific Environmental Coalition's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated ($6.7M), Ff PAC ($3.0M), Workmoney Inc ($1.5M).
Does Pacific Environmental Coalition fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Pacific Environmental Coalition?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sixteen Thirty Fund, Advocacy Action Fund Inc, Oakw Fund.
Where is Pacific Environmental Coalition based?
Pacific Environmental Coalition is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pacific Environmental Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph