Skip to content

· Public charity

Paamonim

To aid and assist other organizations with a similar mission as ours via providing grants and counseling and loans free of interest to the needy withing communities here in the U.S.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$214k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$2.3MFood & Nutrition$835kPhilanthropy$21kHuman Services$15kInternational$13kPublic Benefit$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $571,299, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,336,521 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,765,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $456k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$370k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yad Lachmu Anyu Lenitzruchin$213,540
Cong Mosdos Slonim$100,000
Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah V$84,000
Khal Boyan of Monsey$58,515
Congregation Toldos Yehuda In$40,000
Rodef Chesed$21,350
Chayim Vchesed Inc$15,000
Binyan Yerushlaim$13,500
Keren Marbe Chchme$13,000
Vyazreim Inc$12,394
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Khal Boyan of Monsey: $161k → 14%Congregation Minchas Chinuch: $100k → 17%Yad Elka Inc: $835k → 20%CLEARSHIFT US COMPANY: $80k → 7%Khal Boyan of Monsey: $59k → 14%Congregation Toldos Yehuda In: $40k → 20%CLEARSHIFT US COMPANY: $24k → 7%Vyazreim Inc: $12k → 14%Yad Lachmu Anyu Lenitzruchin: $214k → 20%Yad Lachmu Anyu Lenitzruchin: $120k → 20%Chayim Vchesed Inc: $15k → 20%Keren Marbe Chchme: $13k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $553k → 20%Cong Tzdokah Vchesed: $285k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $183k → 20%Binyan Yerushlaim: $145k → 20%BINYAN YIRUSHALAYIM: $142k → 20%Cong Mosdos Slonim: $100k → 20%Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah V: $84k → 20%Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah V: $78k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $40k → 20%Rodef Chesed: $21k → 20%Binyan Yerushlaim: $14k → 20%YAD MOSHE: $9k → 20%YAD MOSHE: $9k → 20%YAD MOSHE: $6k → 20%Congregation Notzer Chesed In: $16k → 20%YAD MOSHE: $5k → 20%American Committee for Sanz: $13k → 20%MERKAZ HATZEDAKAH: $317k → 20%MERKAZ HATZEDAKAH: $125k → 20%MERKAZ HATZEDAKAH: $114k → 20%TRIP ASIST: $80k → 20%MERKAZ HATZEDAKAH: $68k → 20%Congregation Yeshiva Yad Mois: $60k → 20%RODEPH CHESED DBA: $54k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 8 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$2.8M
$1.3M

Still filing today

0%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2018–2022 · $624k
  • YL
    YAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROEL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $334k

Funded once

  • YE
    YAD ELKA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $835k · revenue +34%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $142k
  • CM
    CONGREGATION MINCHAS CHINUCH OF THE WEST SIDE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $1,222,690 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCIndividual grant recipient: $624,251 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROEL: $333,540 · OtherYAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROELKHAL BOYAN OF MONSEY: $219,902 · OtherKHAL BOYAN OF MONSEYBINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $158,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $142,250 · Other+11 more: $696,851 · Other+11 moreYAD ELKA INC: $835,000 · Food & NutritionYAD ELKA INCRodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed: $21,350 · PhilanthropyCHAYIM V CHESED: $15,000 · ReligionAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $12,500 · InternationalVYAZREIM INC: $12,394 · Public Benefit
Other$3,397,984Food & Nutrition$835,000Philanthropy$21,350Religion$15,000International$12,500Public Benefit$12,394

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAD ELKA INC: $835,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed: $21,350 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAD ELKA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chaim Lechag Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paamonim funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paamonim. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paamonim?

    Find your warmest path to Paamonim through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paamonim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph