Skip to content

· Private foundation

P Vincent LoVoi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$200kCivil Rights$138kRecreation & Sports$131kInternational$82kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kPublic Benefit$47kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$51,800
Woody Guthrie Center$5,000
All Souls Church$2,600
World Food Program$1,000
UNHCR$1,000
Oklahoma Watch$500
Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma$500
Real Black Wall Street Tour$250
OETA$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%World Food Program: $5k → 14%World Food Program: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
IN
CA
NE
WV
MD
NM
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 18 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
33

Total granted

$227k
$479k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

67%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OKLAHOMA WATCH INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +48%
  • The University of Tulsa
    3× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +8%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +188%

Funded once

  • TC
    TERENCE CRUTCHER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $138k
  • BD
    Bob Dylan Center
    one grant, 2024 · $114k
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
3
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
5
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
6
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
7
Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—
8
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
9
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
10
Oklahoma Dental Association

Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.

—
11
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Miracles for Mary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TERENCE CRUTCHER FOUNDATION INC: $138,339 · OtherTERENCE CRUTCHER FOUNDATION INCBob Dylan Center: $113,617 · OtherBob Dylan CenterIndividual grant recipient: $54,820 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $51,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESOxfam: $50,000 · OtherOxfamIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+24 more: $41,988 · Other+24 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $131,200 · EducationUniversity of Notr…The University of Tulsa: $13,000 · EducationThe University of …+4 more: $4,100 · EducationNATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER: $61,294 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL HUMAN…THE TEXAS DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TEXAS DEMO…OKLAHOMA WATCH INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA WATCH…FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF AME…+2 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMercy Corps: $10,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $5,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalJUSTHOPE INC: $9,175 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $5,250 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $3,100 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,550 · Crime & Legal
Other$577,064Education$148,300Arts & Culture$117,794International$23,500Human Services$15,175Civil Rights$5,250Crime & Legal$4,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $131,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER: $61,294 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TEXAS DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA WATCH INC: $13,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTHOPE INC: $9,175 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $3,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE HALL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiracles for Mary Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HUMANITIES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TEXAS DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds JUSTHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Miracles for Mary Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Ruth Nelson Family Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · Zarrow Families Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Gelvin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization P Vincent LoVoi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from P Vincent LoVoi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Theatre Tulsa Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on P Vincent LoVoi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph