How much did Oxford Industries Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of Oxford Industries Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

boys girls

2023

scholarsboys girls

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $15k
$10k–50k10 grants · $252k
$50k–250k3 grants · $175k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$133k

Total assets

Largest grants

Boys and Girls Club of America$75,000
Fulfillment Fund$50,000
Cristo Rey Atlanta Jesuit High School$50,000
United Way of Greater Atlanta$45,000
Equal Opportunity Schools$37,500
Rainier Scholars$37,500
American Red Cross$31,520
Communities in Schools of South Carolina$25,000
The Woodruff Arts Center$25,000
Junior Achievement of the Bluegrass$20,000
SE Early College and Career Academy$10,000
UGA Soft Goods Foundation$10,000
Grady Health Foundation$10,000
United Way Toombs County$7,988
Action Pact$3,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$595k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.3M

$510k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+116%

Still filing today

45%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EO
Equal Opportunity Schools
2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +13%
RS
Rainier Scholars
2× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +108%
GH
Grady Health Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +108%

Funded once

BA
Boys and Girls Club America
one grant, 2021 · $75k
HC
Hawai'i Community Foundation
one grant, 2023 · $53k
CR
Cristo Rey Atlanta Jesuit High Scho
one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

A Pay It Forward Scholarship Inc

Provide tuition scholarships to pre-k through 12th grade georgia private school students in accordance with georgia law.

Education

Friends School of Atlanta

The school's mission is to provide challenging academics in a diverse environment, drawing on the quaker testimonies, or values, of simplicity, peace, integrity, community, equality and stewardship to empower students to go out into the…

—

Junior Achievement of Georgia Inc

To partner with the business community to teach financial literacy to grades k-12.

International

Junior Achievement of Southeastern

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.

International

Girls Global Academy

See schedule o.girls global academy (gga) is an all-girls public charter high school in washington, dc that engenders empowerment and ignites confidence to influence change for global benefit. all students pursue one of two international…

—

Georgia Fugees Academy Charter School Inc

To level the playing field for refugee and new american students by empowwering them.

Education

Girls Inc of Greater Atlanta Inc

Our mission at Girls Incorporated of Greater Atlanta (GIGA) is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. Our programs are evidence-based, aligned with the national Girls Incorporated evaluations, and tailored to meet the unique…

Youth Development

Breakthrough Atlanta

Offering a six-year college preparatory program for underserved students, and a teaching fellowship for undergraduate students.

Education

College Aim Inc

To provide expert coaching from ninth grade through college graduation, and work to dismantle systemic racial and economic barriers, so that greater atlanta students are able to achieve their ambitions.

Education

The Atlanta Academy Inc

Our mission is to give every student the individual attention they need to succeed. this is at the core of everything we do. atlanta academy teaches children from pre-k through eighth grade.

Education

Junior Achievement of Georgia

To teach financial literacy through experiential learning to middle school children in atlanta, fulton county, dekalb county and others.

—

College Summit Inc

Peerforward transforms the lives of low-income youth by connecting them to college and career.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of South and the most unlike its peers is The Gateway Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

15/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,167,082Philanthropy$295,000Education$247,500Human Services$82,000Youth Development$72,000International$40,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation IncGA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Oxford Industries Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: The Frazee Center.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461185268 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on The Frazee Center, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Oxford Industries Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oxford Industries Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Oxford Industries Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oxford Industries Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

Oxford Industries Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oxford Industries Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph