Skip to content
Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc

Through a collective impact model, Overtown Children and Youth Coalition (OCYC) serves as the backbone organization to support anchoring community-based organizations in the community of Overtown to empower the community

$389k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$779kHealth$77kEducation$19kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $278,962, the rows itemized in this filing. The $389,292 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $110,330 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $139k
$17,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URGENT INC$76,454
OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER$62,925
TOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES$35,889
DO GOOD FOR 1$24,300
FLAT$17,600
OVERTOWN OPTIMIST CLUB$16,912
Individual grant recipient$16,089
SUITED FOR SUCCESS$10,000
LEVEL UP TUTORING SERVICE LLC$9,905
CARE ELEMENTARY$8,888
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%URGENT INC: $76k → 15%Urgent Inc: $17k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$813k · 5 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against -99% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$813k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
-99%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $289k · revenue +95%
  • OY
    OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $200k · revenue +166%
  • GP
    GIRL POWER ROCKS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $154k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • OO
    OVERTOWN OPTIMIST CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Miami Girls Foundation Inc
—
2
Engage Miami Inc

Engage miami, inc. is a civic organization that works to increase youth engagement within miami-dade by developing a culture of civic participation that is bold, creative, impactful and local.

—
3
Central Miami Intergroup
—
4
Miami Hype Inc

Miami Hype is dedicated to fostering a sense of community throughout the club and promoting leadership in all club members by teaching and instilling values such as sportsmanship hard work, and integrity, on and off the court.

Recreation & Sports
5
University of Miami
—
6
The Home Team - Miami Inc

The home team's mission is to measurably improve the lives of miami-dade public school students through engagement with academic, sports, and business leaders.

Education
7
Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement
8
The Liberty City Optimist Club of Florida Inc

Mission to enhance the character and physical growth and development of at risk children and youth ages five to fifteen. The Club provides recreational activities and after-school programming.

Youth Development
9
Buskerfest Miami Inc

improving civic life through public perf

Arts & Culture
10
Propel Inc

Propel is a not-for-profit organization is dedicated to fostering leadership potential, academic and career success, and healthy living choices of underserved youth (ages 7-21) living in palm beach, broward, and polk counties of florida by…

Youth Development
11
Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc

Through a collective impact model, Overtown Children and Youth Coalition (OCYC) serves as the backbone organization to support anchoring community-based organizations in the community of Overtown to empower the community

Youth Development
12
Code for Miami Inc

Supporting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through open and transparent governments. Building infrastructures connecting people, businesses, and non-profits through localized data. Equipping institutions and communities with modern tools…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overtown Youth Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Urgent Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $288,843 · Youth DevelopmentTOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INCOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $200,456 · Youth DevelopmentOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INCDO GOOD 41 INC: $24,300 · Youth DevelopmentOVERTOWN OPTIMIST CLUB: $18,499 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL POWER ROCKS INC: $153,805 · EducationGIRL POWER ROCKS INCCARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $8,888 · EducationCARE ELEMENTARY SCHO…URGENT INC: $93,107 · Human ServicesURGENT INCURBAN HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS INC: $77,031 · HealthURBAN HEA…FLAT: $17,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,089 · OtherLEVEL UP TUTORING SERVICE LLC: $9,905 · OtherSUITED FOR SUCCESS INC: $10,000 · Employment
Youth Development$532,098Education$162,693Human Services$93,107Health$77,031Other$43,594Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $288,843 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $200,456 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGIRL POWER ROCKS INC: $153,805 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetURGENT INC: $93,107 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetURBAN HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS INC: $77,031 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetSUITED FOR SUCCESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $8,888 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Mightycause Charitabl…Allegany Franciscan M…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Miami Foundation IncFL21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Girl Power Rocks Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Care Elementary School Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Suited for Success Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Urgent Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc?

Find your warmest path to Overtown Children and Youth Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Overtown Children and Youth Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home