Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Outrider Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Employment$270kScience & Tech$50kSocial Science$26kInternational$8kEducation$5kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$3kPublic Benefit$2kHuman Services$1kOther$96k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $170k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOURNALISM FUNDING PARTNERS$170,000
INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS$25,000
COMPLEXLY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MY NEIGHBOR'S VOICE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$345k · 8 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$345k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+35%

Still filing today

75%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
InternationalEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureEmploymentScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +465%
  • WG
    WISCONSIN'S GREEN FIRE INCORPORATED
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +163%
  • PS
    POWER SHIFT NETWORK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +35%
  • LL
    LOFT LIGHT PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TH
    THE HENRY L STIMSON CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
2
Environment Now
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
5
Climate Central Inc

Climate central, inc. (the organization") is an independent not-for-profit organization of leading scientists, technology experts and communication professionals that are dedicated to researching and reporting on climate change and its…

Science & Tech
6
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
7
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
8
The Alliance for Just Deliberation On Solar Geoengineering Inc

The alliance for just deliberation on solar geoengineering (dsg) is a charitable, scientific and educational organization dedicated to building just and inclusive deliberation about research and potential use of solar geoengineering. solar…

Environment
9
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
10
Outrider Foundation Inc
Environment
11
Canary Media Inc

Canary Media is an independent, nonprofit newsroom covering the transition to clean energy.

Environment
12
Climate Innovation Action Inc

To educate policymakers about climate policies generally and to directly advocate for specific legislation on climate change.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Friday Initiative Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Neighbors Voice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Journalism Funding Partners — $270,000 · EmploymentJournalism Funding PartnersCARBONE CANCER CENTER — $25,000 · OtherCARBONE CANCER CENTERLOFT LIGHT PROJECTS INC — $25,000 · OtherLOFT LIGHT PROJECTS INCCOMPLEXLY INC — $20,000 · OtherCOMPLEXLY INCUW CARBONE CANCER CENTER — $15,000 · OtherUW CARBONE CANCER CENTER+12 more — $16,250 · Other+12 moreSCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INC — $50,000 · Science & TechSCIENCE FRID…INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC — $26,000 · Social ScienceTHE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER — $5,000 · InternationalGLOBAL ZERO — $2,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY — $1,000 · InternationalLAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,000 · EducationEarth Science Womens Network Inc — $1,540 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationWISCONSIN'S GREEN FIRE INCORPORATED — $3,000 · EnvironmentECOAMERICA — $275 · Environment
Employment$270,000Other$101,250Science & Tech$50,000Social Science$26,000International$8,000Education$4,540Environment$3,275

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJournalism Funding Partners — $270,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN'S GREEN FIRE INCORPORATED — $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL ZERO — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOWER SHIFT NETWORK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Science Womens Network Inc — $1,540 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON STREET FREE PRESS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECOAMERICA — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Outrider Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Outrider Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Outrider Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph