Skip to content
Outreach Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Outreach Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$339k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$401kReligion$192kCommunity Improvement$38kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$21kYouth Development$15kAnimals$9kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$333,475
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUND$333,475
KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH$5,683
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REMERGE: $25k → 16%PROVIDENCE BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 16%NEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: $25k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $49k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $20k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $5k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $20k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 7%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $2k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $2k → 14%ST SIMONS UMC: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK: $20k → 18%OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL: $5k → 18%BERRY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 21 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$265k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+202%

Still filing today

24%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $333k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $22k · revenue +44%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +69%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • EC
    EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue -86%
  • RI
    REMERGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +202%
  • NC
    NEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augusta University Foundation Inc

To raise private support from individuals, corporations, foundations, and others to further the interests of augusta university. other purposes of the foundation are to establish and maintain endowments and provide the administration for…

—
2
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
3
Augusta Regional Spca Inc

The arspca advocates the humane treatment of companion animals through leadership and proactive solutions to pet overpopulation including adoptions, spay/neuter efforts, and education.

Animals
4
Animal Adoption Foundation

Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…

Animals
5
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
6
Animal Protective Foundation of Schenectady Inc

Provide care and adoption services for homeless animals and educate the public about spay/neuter programs and animal care.

Animals
7
Angels Among Us Pet Rescue Inc

Angels among us pet rescue, inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to rescuing dogs and cats from shelters and other at-risk situations across georgia. they operate through a network of foster homes in the metro atlanta area and hold pet…

Animals
8
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
9
Asheville Watchdog

Our nbsp;mission nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;inform nbsp;and nbsp;engage nbsp;the nbsp;citizens nbsp;of nbsp;asheville nbsp;and nbsp;surrounding nbsp;communities nbsp;by nbsp;providing nbsp;fair nbsp;factual nbsp;and nbsp;reliable nbsp;in-depth…

Arts & Culture
10
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
11
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
12
Adopt a Golden Atlanta Inc

Adopt a golden atlanta, inc. is a volunteer, nonprofit organization dedicated to finding warm, loving permanent homes for golden retrievers.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empty Stocking Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thats What Friends Are for Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUND: $333,475 · OtherEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUNDKINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $75,683 · OtherKINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCHEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC: $38,125 · OtherEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INCFAITHWORKS: $27,750 · OtherMIDLAND VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $25,000 · OtherNEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $24,500 · Other+20 more: $103,041 · Other+20 moreREMERGE INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $22,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC: $6,000 · EducationLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $1,500 · AnimalsTHATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC: $500 · Animals
Other$652,574Crime & Legal$25,000Food & Nutrition$22,000Education$6,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC: $38,125 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetREMERGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA BALLET INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund Inc: $440 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds THATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Outreach Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Outreach Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Outreach’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home