Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Outreach Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$339k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Human Services$401kReligion$192kCommunity Improvement$38kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$21kYouth Development$15kAnimals$9kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$333,475
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUND$333,475
KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH$5,683
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REMERGE: $25k → 16%PROVIDENCE BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 16%NEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: $25k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $49k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $20k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $5k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $20k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 18%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $3k → 7%KAIROS CHURCH: $5k → 13%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%MARINE CORPS TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 7%KINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITHWORKS: $2k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $2k → 14%SALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK: $2k → 14%ST SIMONS UMC: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK: $20k → 18%OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL: $5k → 18%BERRY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%EAST GEORGIA EASTER SEALS: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - READING FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - CECIL R TURNER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%ASUF - MIXON SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 21 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$265k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+202%

Still filing today

24%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $333k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $22k · revenue +15%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +69%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • EC
    EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue -86%
  • RI
    REMERGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +202%
  • NC
    NEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augusta University Foundation Inc

To raise private support from individuals, corporations, foundations, and others to further the interests of augusta university. other purposes of the foundation are to establish and maintain endowments and provide the administration for…

2
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
3
Augusta Regional Spca Inc

The arspca advocates the humane treatment of companion animals through leadership and proactive solutions to pet overpopulation including adoptions, spay/neuter efforts, and education.

Animals
4
Animal Adoption Foundation

Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…

Animals
5
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
6
Animal Protective Foundation of Schenectady Inc

Provide care and adoption services for homeless animals and educate the public about spay/neuter programs and animal care.

Animals
7
Angels Among Us Pet Rescue Inc

Angels among us pet rescue, inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to rescuing dogs and cats from shelters and other at-risk situations across georgia. they operate through a network of foster homes in the metro atlanta area and hold pet…

Animals
8
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
9
Asheville Watchdog

Our nbsp;mission nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;inform nbsp;and nbsp;engage nbsp;the nbsp;citizens nbsp;of nbsp;asheville nbsp;and nbsp;surrounding nbsp;communities nbsp;by nbsp;providing nbsp;fair nbsp;factual nbsp;and nbsp;reliable nbsp;in-depth…

Arts & Culture
10
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
11
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
12
Adopt a Golden Atlanta Inc

Adopt a golden atlanta, inc. is a volunteer, nonprofit organization dedicated to finding warm, loving permanent homes for golden retrievers.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empty Stocking Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thats What Friends Are for Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUND — $333,475 · OtherEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA CHARITY FUNDKINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCH — $75,683 · OtherKINGSWOOD METHODIST CHURCHEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC — $38,125 · OtherEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INCFAITHWORKS — $27,750 · OtherNEW CHURCH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC — $25,000 · OtherMIDLAND VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE — $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY BRUNSWICK — $24,500 · Other+20 more — $103,041 · Other+20 moreREMERGE INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $22,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC — $6,000 · EducationLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $1,500 · AnimalsTHATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC — $500 · Animals
Other$652,574Crime & Legal$25,000Food & Nutrition$22,000Education$6,000Animals$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC — $38,125 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetREMERGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA BALLET INC — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund Inc — $440 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB OF AUGUSTA INC
  • Who funds REMERGE INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR PRESCHOOL INC
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
  • Who funds AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AUGUSTA BALLET INC
  • Who funds THATS WHAT FRIENDS ARE FOR INC
  • Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Outreach Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Remerge Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph