Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oumu Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$72kCommunity Improvement$56kEnvironment$21kArts & Culture$9kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$2,500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$2,500
DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$1,600
SAN DIEGO FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL$800
URBANA PARKS FOUNDATION$500
ALLIANCE FRANCAISE OF SAN FRANCISCO$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
INST FOR FOOD DEVELOPMENT POLICY$500
URBANA FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$500
CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE CENTER$300
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$300
NOVA UKRAINE$250
RIDGES SANCTUARY$250
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLACK LIVES MATTER: $500 → 8%ADOPT A CLASSROOM INC: $1k → 11%DELEK CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%SAN DIEGO FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL: $800 → 11%UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%DEEPWATER PROJECT: $500 → 13%DONORS CHOOSE: $2k → 17%YOUNG AT ART: $1k → 13%SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 22%ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $12k → 19%NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $1k → 17%ADOPT A CLASSROOM INC: $500 → 11%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 11%DONORS CHOOSE: $989 → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 22%ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 19%ADOPT A CLASSROOM INC: $500 → 11%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 11%DONORS CHOOSE: $600 → 17%ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 19%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY: $8k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $2k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $5k → 19%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $5k → 19%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $940 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $5k → 19%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $850 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $3k → 19%THE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY: $5k → 10%DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO: $850 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $3k → 19%FOOD FIRST-INST FOR FOOD DEV POLICY: $1k → 10%FOOD FIRST-INST FOR FOOD DEV POLICY: $600 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
WY
CA
CO
KS
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Oumu Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 43%.

Oumu Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 22 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$162k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+22%

Still filing today

64%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rocky Mountain Institute
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +52%
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    5× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +1%
  • AI
    ADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • NO
    NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • YA
    YOUNG AT ART
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • DP
    DEEPWATER PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
10
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
11
Berkeley Lab Foundation

To support the scientific and educational purposes of the regents of the university of california (the "university"), in its specific capacity as manager and operator of the lawrence berkeley national laboratory and to carry on other…

Education
12
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Urbana Parks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $51,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISTHE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherTHE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONRocky Mountain Institute: $17,000 · OtherRocky Mountain InstituteTHE CAL FUND UC BERKELEY: $12,500 · OtherTHE CAL FUND UC BERKELEYALLIANCE FRANCAISE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $4,750 · Other+13 more: $10,115 · Other+13 moreDEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,630 · EducationDEL MAR SCHOO…DONORSCHOOSEORG: $4,264 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEO…ADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC: $2,625 · EducationADOPT-A-CLASS…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,950 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO …THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $760 · Education+3 more: $1,540 · Education+3 moreURBANA PARKS FOUNDATION: $2,200 · PhilanthropyURBANA FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,350 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $1,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $1,000 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY INC: $1,500 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE: $500 · InternationalChicago Architecture Foundation: $1,200 · Arts & CultureSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureKNEISEL HALL: $100 · Arts & CultureTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 · Animals
Other$138,365Education$19,769Philanthropy$3,550Environment$2,500International$2,000Arts & Culture$1,800Animals$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,630 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $4,264 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC: $2,625 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetURBANA PARKS FOUNDATION: $2,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetURBANA FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOL: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $540 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELEK CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKNEISEL HALL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALLERLAB INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC ↗
  • Who funds URBANA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds URBANA FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Architecture Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO FRENCH-AMERICAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELEK CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNEISEL HALL ↗
  • Who funds CALLERLAB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY14.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oumu Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oumu Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oumu’s filings →

    More from the funding graph