Skip to content
Otero County Hospital Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Otero County Hospital Association

To extend the healing ministry of jesus christ.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.5MRecreation & Sports$797kEducation$425kPhilanthropy$395kCommunity Improvement$119kArts & Culture$111kYouth Development$13kHuman Services$11k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $972,878, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,181,991 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $209,113 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $963k
$150,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$238M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PMS Chaparral NM Clinic$200,000
Otero County Fair Assoc$191,296
NM State Univ Fdn Inc$168,000
PMS Alamogordo$150,000
Thrive$103,582
PMS Sacramento Mtn Ctr$100,000
PMS Tularosa$50,000
Alamogordo Chamber of Comm$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%NM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $186k → 23%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%NM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 23%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%NM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 23%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $200k → 20%PMS Chaparral NM Clinic: $183k → 20%PMS CHAPARRAL NM CLINIC: $183k → 20%THRIVE: $105k → 20%THRIVE: $100k → 20%THRIVE: $91k → 20%THRIVE: $82k → 20%THRIVE: $78k → 20%THRIVE: $58k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $257k → 20%UNITED WAY: $186k → 20%PMS Alamogordo: $162k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $120k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $115k → 20%PMS ALAMOGORDO: $110k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $70k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $65k → 20%FLICKINGER CENTER: $50k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $45k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $41k → 20%OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $36k → 20%FLICKENGER CENTER: $29k → 20%United Way: $28k → 20%Otero County Fair Association: $21k → 20%GERALD CHAMPION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $21k → 20%ALAMOGORDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 20%FLICKINGER CENTER: $20k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $100k → 20%PMS Sacramento Mountain Center: $75k → 20%PMS SACRAMENTO MOUNTAIN CENTER: $50k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 11 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$6.3M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+78%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +26%
  • OC
    OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $843k · revenue +37% · 53% of their budget
  • NM
    New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $405k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • AP
    ALAMOGORDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +78%
  • NM
    New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rio Rancho Chamber of Commerce

A regional Chamber committed to improving the quality of community life driven by business leadership mentorship advocacy and prosperity.

—
2
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
3
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
4
New Mexico Oil & Gas Association

To promote the safe and responsible development of oil and gas resources in new mexico through advocacy, collaboration, and education.

—
5
New Mexico Construction Alliance

As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…

—
6
Taos County Economic Development Corp

The organization was formed in 1987. Its mission is "supporting land, food, water, and the cultures" of the people of northern New Mexico through the design and implementation of community and economic development programs and projects.

Community Improvement
7
Outdoor New Mexico

To promote the protection, appreciation, sustainable management, appropriate recreational use, and economic benefits of outdoor natural areas in new mexico, and promote educational and workforce development activities that advance these…

Environment
8
Llano Chamber of Commerce

To assist the local business, governmental and individual community in developing better business relationships and to increase the local revenue base by encouraging tourism and business development.

—
9
Taos County Chamber of Commerce

The taos chamber of commerce exists to cultivate and sustain a healthy business environment.

—
10
Southwestern New Mexico State Fair

To operate a county fair.

Recreation & Sports
11
New Mexico Ethics Watch

New mexico ethics watch is dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life.

Public Benefit
12
Encore Entertainment Inc

Provide performing arts events for southeast new mexico.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Otero County Fair Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Otero County Economic Development Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES: $3,783,360 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES+2 more: $57,257 · HealthOTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $842,547 · Recreation & SportsOTERO COUNTY F…THRIVE IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $830,091 · PhilanthropyTHRIVE IN SOUT…FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $147,075 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $127,749 · OtherOTERO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $60,000 · OtherALAMOGORDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $59,464 · OtherALAMOGORDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20,200 · Other+2 more: $27,450 · OtherNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $405,225 · EducationLOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY: $16,017 · Religion
Health$3,840,617Recreation & Sports$842,547Philanthropy$830,091Other$441,938Education$405,225Religion$16,017

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES: $3,783,360 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $842,547 over 9y, 53% of budgetTHRIVE IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $830,091 over 9y, 50% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $405,225 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $147,075 over 7y, 10% of budgetOTERO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $60,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetALAMOGORDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $59,464 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetGERALD CHAMPION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $50,957 over 3y, 13% of budgetLOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY: $16,017 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetNew Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence: $6,300 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds OTERO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ALAMOGORDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GERALD CHAMPION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Mountains …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sacramento Mountains Foundation IncNM13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Mountains Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Otero County Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Otero County Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Otero County Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home