· Public charity
Otero County Hospital Association
To extend the healing ministry of jesus christ.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $972,878 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,181,991 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $209,113 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $963k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PMS Chaparral NM Clinic | $200,000 |
| Otero County Fair Assoc | $191,296 |
| NM State Univ Fdn Inc | $168,000 |
| PMS Alamogordo | $150,000 |
| Thrive | $103,582 |
| PMS Sacramento Mtn Ctr | $100,000 |
| PMS Tularosa | $50,000 |
| Alamogordo Chamber of Comm | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +17%
- OCOTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $843k · revenue +37% · 53% of their budget
- NMNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $405k · revenue +148%
Funded once
- APALAMOGORDO PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2024 · $20k
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +78%
- NMNew Mexico Center for Nursing Excellenceone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A regional Chamber committed to improving the quality of community life driven by business leadership mentorship advocacy and prosperity.
To promote the safe and responsible development of oil and gas resources in new mexico through advocacy, collaboration, and education.
As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…
The organization was formed in 1987. Its mission is "supporting land, food, water, and the cultures" of the people of northern New Mexico through the design and implementation of community and economic development programs and projects.
To promote the protection, appreciation, sustainable management, appropriate recreational use, and economic benefits of outdoor natural areas in new mexico, and promote educational and workforce development activities that advance these…
To assist the local business, governmental and individual community in developing better business relationships and to increase the local revenue base by encouraging tourism and business development.
The taos chamber of commerce exists to cultivate and sustain a healthy business environment.
To operate a county fair.
New mexico ethics watch is dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life.
Provide performing arts events for southeast new mexico.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Otero County Fair Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Otero County Economic Development Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OTERO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
- Who funds FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds OTERO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ALAMOGORDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds GERALD CHAMPION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Mountains Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Otero County Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.