Skip to content

· Private foundation

Osprey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$162kArts & Culture$107kCrime & Legal$65kHealth$60kInternational$58kReligion$32kEducation$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $82k
$11,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$874k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$13,000
EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$13,000
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE$12,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$12,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$11,000
CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKE$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KQED$5,000
RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $12k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $13k → 14%KIJANA ED EMPOWERMENT: $12k → 11%CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKE: $6k → 9%GEOS INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $12k → 18%CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA: $10k → 14%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $12k → 14%KIJANA ED EMPOWERMENT: $10k → 11%CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKE: $5k → 9%CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA: $5k → 14%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $10k → 14%KIJANA ED EMPOWERMENT: $10k → 11%CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKE: $5k → 9%CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA: $5k → 14%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $10k → 14%KIJANA ED EMPOWERMENT: $7k → 11%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $8k → 14%KIJANA ED EMPOWERMENT: $6k → 11%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 17%EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $8k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $11k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $10k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $10k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $9k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $8k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $6k → 14%CITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $6k → 14%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $13k → 14%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $12k → 14%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $12k → 14%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POVERTY CTR: $10k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POVERTY CTR: $10k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POVERTY CTR: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OR
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$557k · 13 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$557k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+277%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    7× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +75%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +18%
  • Earth Island Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • GI
    GEOS INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +277%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $65,000 · OtherEARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUNDCITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSY: $59,500 · OtherCITIZENS UNITED FOR RESEARCH OF EPILEPSYIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POVERTY CTR: $42,500 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POVERTY CTRCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKE: $31,750 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH4 PETE SAKEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKQED: $17,000 · OtherKQEDRIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONEarth Island Institute Inc: $42,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute …CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $12,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION BIOLOGY IN…GEOS INSTITUTE: $5,000 · EnvironmentChicago Symphony Orchestra: $62,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony …CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PUBLIC ME…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $58,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INT…
Other$306,750Environment$119,000Arts & Culture$90,000International$58,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $62,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGEOS INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GEOS INSTITUTE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Osprey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Osprey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Conservation Biology Institute: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Osprey’s filings →

More from the funding graph