Skip to content
Osma Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Osma Foundation

Referral services and financial assistance for substance abuse disorders.

$292k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.5MEducation$237kYouth Development$49kInternational$8kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $267,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $292,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS$150,000
OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION$30,000
EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES$20,000
HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA$20,000
OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$12,500
TCMS FOUNDATION$10,000
REACH OUT AND READ INC$10,000
HEALTH OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUC$7,500
ALPHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLA$7,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES: $10k → 13%TCMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $35k → 16%AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES: $20k → 13%TCMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $34k → 16%AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES: $17k → 13%TCMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $30k → 16%AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 14%TCMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $25k → 16%TCMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $20k → 16%TICK BORNE ILLNESS SOCIETY: $10k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $35k → 16%HEALTH OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUC: $8k → 15%HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA: $30k → 16%SCHOOLS FOR HEALTHY LIFE STYLES: $30k → 16%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $10k → 16%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $10k → 16%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $10k → 16%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $9k → 16%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $9k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $162k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $150k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $23k → 16%OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES: $17k → 16%EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES: $17k → 16%EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES: $15k → 16%MANOS JUNTAS: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 9 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+46%

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +36% · 38% of their budget
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $83k · revenue +40%
  • REACH OUT AND READ INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHOOLS FOR HEALTHY LIFE STYLES
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • TB
    TICK BORNE ILLNESS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • FM
    Fundacion Manos Juntas
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
2
Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

Health
3
Oklahoma County Medical Society

Promote medical science in Oklahoma County.

—
4
Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

—
5
Oklahoma Osteopathic Association

The mission of the Oklahoma Osteopathic Association is to promote the health of all Oklahomans through education and advocacy for the osteopathic profession.

—
6
Public Health Institute of Oklahoma

To facilitate public health improvements.

Health
7
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
8
Okefenokee Health Inc

Public charity whose purpose is to promote community health through activities designed to ensure and improve access to healthcare for all individuals in the community and to promote healthcare and wellness in the communities.

—
9
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
10
Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—
11
Oklahoma Health Sciences Facility

To enhance and promote the educational mission and delivery of healthcare of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center through the acquisition improvement and development of various and sundry facilities and performing of any an…

Education
12
Oklahoma Literacy Coalition Inc

Supports Literacy Efforts Statewide by providing continuing education for literacy providers, grants to literacy organizations, and literacy awareness to government and media.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Schools Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Educational Alternatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INC: $1,212,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INCEDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES: $47,000 · Health+2 more: $27,500 · HealthHEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INC: $189,000 · OtherHEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INCOKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $83,020 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCI…Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherOCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTCMS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherTCMS FOUNDATIONSCHOOLS FOR HEALTHY LIFE STYLES: $30,000 · OtherSCHOOLS FOR HEALTHY LIFE STYL…AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $19,321 · Other+3 more: $30,650 · Other+3 moreREACH OUT AND READ INC: $48,000 · EducationTULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyALPHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLA: $7,200 · Human Services
Health$1,286,500Other$483,491Education$48,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$7,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INC: $1,212,000 over 8y, 38% of budgetHEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INC: $189,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetOKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $83,020 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES: $47,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $19,321 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLA CO MED SOC-COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 62% of budgetTULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALPHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLA: $7,200 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Osma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Osma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Osma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home