· Public charity
Osma Foundation
Referral services and financial assistance for substance abuse disorders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $267,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $292,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS | $150,000 |
| OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA | $20,000 |
| EDUCATIOAL ALTERNATIVES | $20,000 |
| OCMS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| TCMS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| REACH OUT AND READ INC | $10,000 |
| HEALTH OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUC | $7,500 |
| ALPHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLA | $7,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHOKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +19% · 38% of their budget
- OSOKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION3× · 2022–2024 · $83k · revenue +55%
REACH OUT AND READ INC5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- SFSCHOOLS FOR HEALTHY LIFE STYLESone grant, 2017 · $30k
- TBTICK BORNE ILLNESS SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $10k
- FMFundacion Manos Juntasone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote medical science in Oklahoma County.
The mission of the Oklahoma Osteopathic Association is to promote the health of all Oklahomans through education and advocacy for the osteopathic profession.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Patient care and research are offered to provide education to members and students and to offer quality care to individuals without regard to the patients ability to pay.
The Utah Medical Association is a professional resource for member physicians providing educational opportunities and dissemination of medical knowledge and practices.
To enhance and promote the educational mission and delivery of healthcare of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center through the acquisition improvement and development of various and sundry facilities and performing of any an…
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.
Public charity whose purpose is to promote community health through activities designed to ensure and improve access to healthcare for all individuals in the community and to promote healthcare and wellness in the communities.
The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.
Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…
The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Schools Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Educational Alternatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OKLAHOMA HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OKLA CO MED SOC-COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fundacion Manos Juntas ↗
- Who funds Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OKLA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Osma Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.