Skip to content
Oshkosh Family Incorporated at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oshkosh Family Incorporated

To administer several programs to help guide families toward self-sufficiency and a more satisfying life.

$46k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Employment$18kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$18kInternational$18kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$8kHealth$8k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $45,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKESIDE PACKAGING$7,500
NAMI OSHKOSH$7,500
OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY$7,500
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER$7,500
WINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE: $10k → 11%HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 3 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$53k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+96%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +120%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue -8%
  • RI
    REMARKABLE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +96%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need

—
2
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation is to strengthen our communities. the organization accomplishes this through: leadership and funding to address current and emerging needs; collaboration and partnership with…

Philanthropy
3
Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

—
4
Open Arms Housing Inc

Open Arms Housings (OAH) mission is to provide permanent homes and ongoing support to women experiencing homelessness. Special care is taken to provide comprehensive mental health support to OAH clients.

Human Services
5
Hiawatha Homes Inc

Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.

—
6
Oswego County Opportunities Inc

To inspire partnerships and provide services that empower people, support communities and change lives.

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Area Neighborhood Service Center Inc

The Service Center offers a variety of programs including but not limited to: emergency food shelf and food commodities programs for mothers with small children and seniors; monthly supplemental food programs for seniors and the disabled;…

—
9
Rockford Area Habitat for Humanity

To advocate on behalf of those in need of decent shelter by building and renovating affordable houses.

Housing & Shelter
10
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
11
Habitat for Humanity of Northwest Metro Atlanta Inc

Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…

—
12
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Oshkoshinc; the most unlike its peers is Nami Oshkosh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REMARKABLE INC: $17,500 · OtherREMARKABLE INCWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $7,500 · OtherWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INCNami Oshkosh Inc: $7,500 · OtherNami Oshkosh IncOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNI…THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $17,500 · InternationalTHE SALVATION ARMY W…CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTINE ANN DOMEST…HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesHOOPER COMMUNITY CEN…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR…
Other$32,500Food & Nutrition$17,500International$17,500Human Services$17,500Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREMARKABLE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetNami Oshkosh Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 8.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Communit…Silver Star Brands Fo…Oshkosh Corporation F…Theda and Tamblin Cla…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Community Foundation …Green Bay Packers Fou…Otto Bremer Trust
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oshkosh Family Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oshkosh Family Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oshkosh Family Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Oshkosh Family Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oshkosh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home