Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Oshkosh Family Incorporated

To administer several programs to help guide families toward self-sufficiency and a more satisfying life.

$46k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Employment$18kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$18kInternational$18kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$8kHealth$8k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $46,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMI OSHKOSH$7,500
OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY$7,500
HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER$7,500
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
LAKESIDE PACKAGING$7,500
WINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE: $10k → 11%HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 3 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$53k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+96%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +120%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue -13%
  • RI
    REMARKABLE INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +83%
  • CA
    CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need

2
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation is to strengthen our communities. the organization accomplishes this through: leadership and funding to address current and emerging needs; collaboration and partnership with…

Philanthropy
3
Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

4
Open Arms Housing Inc

Open Arms Housings (OAH) mission is to provide permanent homes and ongoing support to women experiencing homelessness. Special care is taken to provide comprehensive mental health support to OAH clients.

Human Services
5
Hiawatha Homes Inc

Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.

6
Oswego County Opportunities Inc

To inspire partnerships and provide services that empower people, support communities and change lives.

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

8
Area Neighborhood Service Center Inc

The Service Center offers a variety of programs including but not limited to: emergency food shelf and food commodities programs for mothers with small children and seniors; monthly supplemental food programs for seniors and the disabled;…

9
Rockford Area Habitat for Humanity

To advocate on behalf of those in need of decent shelter by building and renovating affordable houses.

Housing & Shelter
10
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
11
Habitat for Humanity of Northwest Metro Atlanta Inc

Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…

12
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Oshkoshinc and the most unlike its peers is Nami Oshkosh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REMARKABLE INC — $17,500 · OtherREMARKABLE INCWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC — $7,500 · OtherWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INCNami Oshkosh Inc — $7,500 · OtherNami Oshkosh IncOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $17,500 · Food & NutritionOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNI…THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE — $17,500 · InternationalTHE SALVATION ARMY W…CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTINE ANN DOMEST…HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesHOOPER COMMUNITY CEN…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR…
Other$32,500Food & Nutrition$17,500International$17,500Human Services$17,500Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREMARKABLE INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNami Oshkosh Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 8.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Silver Star Brands Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oshkosh Family Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oshkosh Family Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Oshkosh Family Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph