Skip to content
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION is to strengthen our communities.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
126
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$12MEducation$9.8MHealth$6.4MHuman Services$5.1MHousing & Shelter$3.2MPublic Benefit$3.1MArts & Culture$2.8MReligion$1.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 126 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 126 grants below total $8,200,722, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,395,927 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,195,205 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $250k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.1M
$18,600
Median grant
13
States reached
$201M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION$1,000,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC$850,437
CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC$607,653
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA$533,737
LOURDES ACADEMY OF OSHKOSH WISCONSIN INC$356,684
CITY OF OSHKOSH$264,585
EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL$259,500
NOVA COUNSELING SERVICES$250,250
OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA$222,981
RIPON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$215,440
BASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP$200,110
NEENAH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT$189,751
OSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$184,854
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$177,464
ASHP FOUNDATION$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MURPHSLIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $145k → 11%HELIOS HEURISTIC: $25k → 6%CAP SERVICES INC: $95k → 7%FRIENDS OF THE BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $51k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 11%SAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $26k → 9%SCALA FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $50k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $47k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $33k → 6%Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc: $24k → 6%HEADSUP FOX CITIES: $23k → 6%CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL INC: $256k → 7%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $608k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $306k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $223k → 11%JAKE'S DIAPERS: $92k → 7%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $196k → 11%JAKE'S DIAPERS: $40k → 7%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $182k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $169k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $148k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $145k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $117k → 11%Oshkosh Community YMCA: $116k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $86k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $83k → 11%DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $80k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $71k → 11%OSHKOSH COMMUNITY YMCA: $54k → 11%HOOPER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $40k → 11%DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $34k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $30k → 11%DAY BY DAY WARMING SHELTER INC: $28k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $92k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $83k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $65k → 11%FATHER CARR'S PLACE 2B LTD: $41k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $29k → 11%FATHER CARR'S PLACE 2B LTD: $27k → 11%EVERGREEN FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%FATHER CARR'S PLACE 2B LTD: $23k → 11%EVERGREEN FOUNDATION INC: $23k → 11%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $148k → 11%Christine ann domestic abuse services Inc: $67k → 11%JAKE'S NETWORK OF HOPE: $41k → 11%HEADSUP FOX CITIES: $36k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
NJ
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48M · 185 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

185 repeat relationships: 106 still active in FY2025, 79 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

185
94

Total granted

$48M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+12%

Still filing today

70%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $416k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.4M · revenue +54% · 37% of their budget
  • OA
    OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION
    2× · 2022–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +122% · 100% of their budget
  • OC
    Oshkosh Community YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • RC
    RIPON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $252k · revenue +30%
  • SI
    STEP INDUSTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $197k
  • GL
    GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation is to strengthen our communities. the organization accomplishes this through: leadership and funding to address current and emerging needs; collaboration and partnership with…

Philanthropy
2
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
3
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
6
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
7
Oshkosh Chamber of Commerce

To provide leadership and to serve and represent our members so their businesses and our communities will prosper.

—
8
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
9
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
10
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
11
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
12
Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative Corporation

Wwbic opens the doors of opportunity by providing any individuals who are interested in starting, strengthening, or expanding businesses with access to resources such as financial products and quality business and personal financial…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

211 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 211 of the 305 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
64
Early backer (in before they grew)
202/211
Grantees still filing
145/211
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF OSHKOSH: $3,222,368 · OtherCITY OF OSHKOSHLOURDES ACADEMY OF OSHKOSH WISCONSIN INC: $3,187,338 · OtherLOURDES ACADEMY OF OSHKOSH WISCONSIN INCNEENAH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,288,242 · OtherNEENAH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICTOSHKOSH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,207,776 · OtherRipon Area School District: $912,523 · OtherOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $825,039 · Other+110 more: $13,502,141 · Other+110 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $7,360,938 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA: $3,250,132 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE T…OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $650,090 · Youth DevelopmentOSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION IN…+5 more: $248,363 · Youth DevelopmentOshkosh Community YMCA: $1,391,124 · Human ServicesOshkosh Com…CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $1,353,962 · Human ServicesCHRISTINE A…DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $596,431 · Human ServicesDAY BY DAY …CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL IN: $261,425 · Human ServicesADVOCAP INC: $249,123 · Human ServicesJAKE'S DIAPERS INC: $204,970 · Human Services+20 more: $1,022,165 · Human Services+20 moreNOVA COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $479,150 · HealthSOLUTIONS RECOVERY INC: $422,605 · HealthTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $408,213 · HealthCATALPA HEALTH INC: $404,710 · HealthPARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $207,500 · HealthNEW DAWN RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $200,186 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $188,800 · HealthCOVEY INC: $177,341 · HealthUNITY RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $130,504 · Health+10 more: $511,146 · HealthOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION: $1,454,766 · PhilanthropyBASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP INC: $317,068 · PhilanthropyBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $107,103 · Philanthropy+4 more: $190,822 · PhilanthropyPAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC: $780,731 · Arts & CultureTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $413,699 · Arts & CultureFOX CITIES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $190,013 · Arts & CultureBIRCH CREEK MUSIC PERFORMANCE CENTER INC: $90,100 · Arts & CultureOSHKOSH YOUTH SYMPHONY: $85,851 · Arts & CultureTHRASHER OPERA HOUSE CORPORATION: $72,385 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $252,230 · Arts & CultureEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $528,500 · EducationOSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $275,095 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE: $252,000 · EducationWISCONSIN INDEPENDENT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $110,357 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $82,550 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC: $81,839 · EducationACTON ACADEMY OSHKOSH INC: $77,250 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $57,000 · Education+2 more: $64,200 · Education
Other$24,145,427Youth Development$11,509,523Human Services$5,079,200Health$3,130,155Philanthropy$2,219,759Arts & Culture$1,885,009Education$1,528,791

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $7,360,938 over 9y, 37% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA: $3,250,132 over 9y, 27% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION: $1,454,766 over 2y, 100% of budgetOshkosh Community YMCA: $1,391,124 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $1,353,962 over 9y, 12% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $825,039 over 9y, 25% of budgetPAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC: $780,731 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $689,174 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetOSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $650,090 over 3y, 19% of budgetDAY BY DAY SHELTER INC: $596,431 over 9y, 22% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF THE FOX VALLEY INC: $537,748 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $528,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $521,455 over 6y, 28% of budgetTHE MOORING PROGRAMS INCORPORATED: $499,900 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetNOVA COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $479,150 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetWINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $471,770 over 9y, 65% of budgetCOTS INC: $429,621 over 5y, 33% of budgetSOLUTIONS RECOVERY INC: $422,605 over 9y, 35% of budgetTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $413,699 over 9y, 11% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $408,213 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetCATALPA HEALTH INC: $404,710 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC: $383,381 over 7y, 31% of budgetFOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $341,304 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetBASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP INC: $317,068 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetGREEN LAKE GREENWAYS: $305,000 over 6y, 36% of budgetOSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $275,095 over 8y, 34% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $266,954 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFORWARD SERVICE CORPORATION: $261,830 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL IN: $261,425 over 2y, 25% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $252,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADVOCAP INC: $249,123 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $247,195 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGO-EDC FOUNDATION INC: $245,650 over 7y, 75% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN: $237,834 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNami Oshkosh Inc: $236,541 over 5y, 60% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER FOX VALLEY INC: $225,300 over 4y, 26% of budgetST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES: $216,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $207,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJAKE'S DIAPERS INC: $204,970 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetNEW DAWN RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $200,186 over 3y, 22% of budgetSTEP INDUSTRIES INC: $197,100 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetREACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $195,080 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetFOX CITIES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $190,013 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $188,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOVEY INC: $177,341 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS (ASHP): $165,625 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $150,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTN: $150,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PROPERTY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Oshkosh Community YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAINE ART CENTER & GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAY BY DAY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF THE FOX VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOORING PROGRAMS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NOVA COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WINNEBAGO AREA LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAND OSHKOSH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALPA HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OSHKOSHINC ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LAKE GREENWAYS ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL IN ↗
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCAP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …J J Keller Foundation…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Green Bay Packers Fou…United Way Fox Cities…Greater Green Bay Com…Basic Needs Giving Pa…Theda and Tamblin Cla…Oshkosh Area United W…Jek Foundation IncOshkosh Corporation F…The Clarence Wallace …
Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI134.9× affinity88 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way Fox Cities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · Jek Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp): 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 305 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oshkosh Area’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home