Skip to content

· Private foundation

Orr James Donald Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$188kHealth$124kHuman Services$104kFood & Nutrition$101kEducation$94k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC$25,000
BRYAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,000
BOYS CLUBS OF BRAZOS COUNTY INC$20,000
METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES$10,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC$10,000
TWIN CITY MISSION$10,000
BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC$10,000
HEALTH FOR ALL CLINIC INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $17k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $9k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $9k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $3k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$589k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$589k
$19k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $101k · revenue +49%
  • BI
    Bryan ISD Education Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $94k · revenue +108%
  • BC
    Boys Club of Brazos County Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAM HOUSTON AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
2
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
3
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
4
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
5
Boys and Girls Club of Brazoria County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
6
Brazos Valley Cdc Inc

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our communities in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in…

Housing & Shelter
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas

To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.

Youth Development
8
Northwest Texas Council of Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. The aims of the Boy Scouts of America is to promote character…

—
9
Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry

The mission of the Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry and Support Center is to serve Bastrop County residents going through periods of transition by providing emergency food assistance, education and support.

—
10
Boys & Girls Club of the Red River Valle y

To promote the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of youth in and around Lamar County, Texas.

—
11
Boys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

—
12
United Way of the Brazos Valley

The United Way of the Brazos Valley brings the community together to find solutions that change people's lives. UWBV will be the community leader and trusted partner that proactively seeks solutions to community-wide issues.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Brazos Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bryan Isd Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Club of Brazos County Inc: $89,745 · Youth DevelopmentBoys Club of Brazos County IncBoy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council: $48,745 · Youth DevelopmentBoy Scouts of America Sam Houst…GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $30,900 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXASTwin City Mission: $62,745 · OtherTwin City MissionMETHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES - CRESTVIEW: $21,900 · OtherMETHODIST RETIREMENT C…METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $19,000 · OtherMETHODIST RETIREMENT C…SAM HOUSTON AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF: $10,000 · OtherSAM HOUSTON AREA COUNC…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $9,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $100,745 · Food & NutritionBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD…Bryan ISD Education Foundation: $94,245 · EducationBryan ISD Educati…BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $60,745 · HealthBRAZOS VALL…Health for All Inc: $3,000 · HealthHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $60,245 · Human ServicesHospice Bra…
Youth Development$169,390Other$122,645Food & Nutrition$100,745Education$94,245Health$63,745Human Services$60,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $100,745 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBryan ISD Education Foundation: $94,245 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $89,745 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTwin City Mission: $62,745 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $60,745 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $60,245 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council: $48,745 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $30,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Bryan ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Health for All Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable TrustMO24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Orr Carl and Lena Charitable Trust · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orr James Donald Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orr James Donald Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Orr James Donald’s filings →

    More from the funding graph