Skip to content
Orlando Family Foundation for Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Orlando Family Foundation for Charities

To raise money to fund other charitable organizations

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$193kHuman Services$163kReligion$117kFood & Nutrition$38kPhilanthropy$38kEducation$36kHousing & Shelter$250
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$43,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CREATIVE CONCEPTS FOR LIVING$43,000
ITALIAN OPEN ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT$43,000
AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY$43,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNNYHILL INC: $38k → 9%CREATIVE CONCEPTS FOR LIVING: $43k → 11%STL VILLAGE: $40k → 21%FEED MY PEOPLE: $38k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reach St Charles

Our goal is to connect individuals in St Charles County with resources to address their specific need(s), on a case-by-case basis. We provide food boxes, holiday meal boxes, distribute meals, supplies, and clothing to the homeless, and…

Human Services
2
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
3
Fulfillment House Inc
Health
4
Recovery St Louis
Health
5
St Vincent De Paul St John Vianney Conference

Assist the poor and homeless

Human Services
6
Who Can We Help Inc

Organization is organized in the community to support families in need on all major holidays, as well as donating various goods to local community centers as resources are available.

Human Services
7
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
8
Marybeth's Cottage

Housing and daily needs for families whose children are in the hospital

Health
9
Marthas Vineyard Mission Inc

Feeding nbsp;and nbsp;meeting nbsp;other nbsp;needs nbsp;of nbsp;the nbsp;elderly nbsp;and nbsp;disadvanted nbsp;people

—
10
United in Love Adoptions
Human Services
11
St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen

Charity

—
12
Chestnut Hill Meals On Wheels

Chestnut hill meals on wheels (the organization) is a community based, non profit organization devoted to meeting the daily nutritional needs of any of our neighbors challenged by illness, disability or age. respecting our clients' desire…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pony Bird Inc; the most unlike its peers is Families Roc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY: $43,000 · OtherAQUINAS INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGYST LOUIS ITALIAN INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT FOR CHARITIES: $43,000 · OtherST LOUIS ITALIAN INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT …CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONFAMILIES ROC: $38,000 · OtherFAMILIES ROCUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $38,000 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEURSULINE ACADEMY KIRKWOOD MO: $36,000 · OtherURSULINE ACADEMY KIRKWOOD MO+1 more: $250 · OtherPONY BIRD INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesPONY BIRD INCCREATIVE CONCEPTS FOR LIVING INC: $43,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE CONCEPTS FOR LIVING INCSTL Village Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesSTL Village IncSUNNYHILL INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesSUNNYHILL INCFEED MY PEOPLE: $38,000 · Human ServicesFEED MY PEOPLEWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalSANTA NEEDS HELP INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropySERVANT UNITED MINISTRIES INC: $36,000 · Religion
Other$238,250Human Services$233,000Crime & Legal$40,000Philanthropy$38,000Religion$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPONY BIRD INC: $74,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCREATIVE CONCEPTS FOR LIVING INC: $43,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS ITALIAN INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT FOR CHARITIES: $43,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSTL Village Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNNYHILL INC: $38,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE: $38,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES ROC: $38,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFONTEBELLA NFP: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…St Louis Community Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
St Louis Community FoundationMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orlando Family Foundation for Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orlando Family Foundation for Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Orlando Family Foundation for Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Orlando Family Foundation for Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Orlando Family Foundation for Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home