· Public charity
Oregon State Credit Union
Our vision is to create financial solutions to make lives better.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $167,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $289,041 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $121,441 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEACHHEALTH SACRED HEART | $33,200 |
| METRO AFFORDABLE HOUSING | $30,000 |
| WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $23,500 |
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $20,700 |
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK | $15,000 |
| FILENE | $15,000 |
| LINN-BENTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK6× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +31%
Oregon State University Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +42%
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $126k · revenue +155%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON AND LINCOLN COUNTIESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +78%
- CCCORVALLIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +4%
- BHBENTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.
Purposeful living in a diverse community. using the power of resident driven community to enhance wellbeing.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Since 1958, United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties has been raising funds and creating partnerships to improve lives and strengthen communities. We collaborate to support a foundation for the well-being, safety, and academic success of…
Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Health & Science University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Linn-Benton Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds PEACEHEALTH SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON AND LINCOLN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC ↗
- Who funds Metro Affordable Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds ABC HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HOME LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds GARTEN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CORVALLIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds BENTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Benton Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oregon State Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Home Life Inc — 95% of income from government
- Garten Services Inc — 34% of income from government
- Abc House Inc — 25% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Western Oregon University Development Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Linn-Benton Community College Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.