Skip to content
Oregon School-Based Health Alliance at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Oregon School-Based Health Alliance

Our mission is to center youth through the expansion of school health services that shatter health and education disparities, honor youth identities and voices, and prioritize their wellness and joy.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$427kYouth Development$44k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$381k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER$20,000
MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$15,000
UMATILLA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH$15,000
BAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$9,684
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUN: $18k → 8%CLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS: $8k → 8%CROOK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $12k → 11%SUNRISE FAMILY CLINIC: $8k → 11%Public Health Fndn of Col Cty: $15k → 11%UMATILLA COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $20k → 12%MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $15k → 12%Rogue Community Health: $19k → 13%Community Counseling Solution: $10k → 13%BETHEL HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 15%BAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $13k → 16%WATERFALL CHC: $8k → 17%BENTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES: $8k → 18%VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUN: $11k → 8%Crook County Health Departmen: $11k → 11%COLUMBIA HEALTH SERVICES: $11k → 11%UMATILLA COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $15k → 12%MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $15k → 12%MORROW COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: $8k → 13%BAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%Virginia Garcia Memorial Foun: $15k → 8%Public Health Fndn of Col Cty: $10k → 11%UMATILLA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $15k → 12%MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $11k → 12%COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTION: $8k → 13%BAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%Virginia Garcia Memorial Foun: $10k → 8%Umatilla County Health Dept: $15k → 12%MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $11k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 8%UMATILLA COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $12k → 12%OUTSIDE IN: $12k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 8%Umatilla County Health Dept: $11k → 12%Outside In: $11k → 12%UMATILLA COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $11k → 12%Multnomah County Health Dept: $15k → 12%MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $14k → 12%Multnomah County Health Dept: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 9 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$404k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+162%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VG
    VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +30%
  • CH
    Columbia Health Services
    3× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +138%
  • OUTSIDE IN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $23k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue +162%
  • BH
    BETHEL HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CC
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMATILLA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $98,500 · OtherUMATILLA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICESMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeless Services: $91,400 · OtherMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeless ServicesBAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $31,870 · OtherBAKER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTOUTSIDE IN: $23,000 · OtherOUTSIDE INCROOK COUNTY: $23,000 · OtherCROOK COUNTY+5 more: $40,500 · Other+5 moreVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $53,500 · HealthVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONColumbia Health Services: $35,427 · HealthColumbia Health ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $19,143 · HealthROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTHCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS: $17,271 · HealthCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONSWATERFALL CLINIC INC: $7,500 · Health
Other$308,270Health$162,841

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $53,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetColumbia Health Services: $35,427 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $19,143 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS: $17,271 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWATERFALL CLINIC INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Health Services ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds WATERFALL CLINIC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Careoregon IncOregon Primary Care A…Oregon State Sheriff'…The Roundhouse Founda…The Collins FoundationCenter for Technology…Tides FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · Oregon Primary Care Association · Oregon State Sheriff's Association · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Tides Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon School-Based Health Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon School-Based Health Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • Columbia Health Services: 25% of income from government
  • Waterfall Clinic Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Community Counseling Solutions: 14% of income from government
  • Rogue Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Health Center: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oregon School-Based Health Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Oregon School-Based Health Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon School-Based Health Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home