Skip to content
Oregon Coast Visitors Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregon Coast Visitors Association Inc

To promote tourism, travel, and recreation along the gorgeous oregon coast.

$299k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Recreation & Sports$154kCommunity Improvement$94kFood & Nutrition$86kPublic Benefit$20kArts & Culture$11kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $291,275, the rows itemized in this filing. The $299,426 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,151 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRAILKEEPERS OF OREGON$91,708
COLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEV$62,500
Individual grant recipient$24,000
TRAVEL SOUTHERN OREGON COAST$21,000
FOOD ROOTS$19,000
Individual grant recipient$12,167
CITY OF TOLEDO$10,000
CURRY COUNTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LOWER NEHALEM COMMUNITY TRUST$7,500
OREGON COAST TRAIL FOUNDATION$7,400
OREGON RIDES & EVENTS LLC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEV: $63k → 11%LOWER NEHALEM COMMUNITY TRUST: $8k → 12%OREGON MADE CREATIVE FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%LEARN PRODUCTIONS LLC: $67k → 13%CURRY COUNTY: $10k → 14%CAPE PERPETUA COLLABORATIVE: $24k → 15%PORT OF TOLEDO: $12k → 16%TRAVEL SOUTHERN OREGON COAST: $21k → 17%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 18%FOOD ROOTS: $19k → 12%TOLEDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 16%OREGON COAST TRAIL FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CITY OF TOLEDO: $10k → 16%SAFARI TOWN SURF SHOP: $11k → 16%WALDPORT CHAMBER: $10k → 16%NEWPORT TRAIL STEWARDS: $10k → 16%OREGON RIDES & EVENTS LLC: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
2
Earth Day Oregon
—
3
The Oregon Community Foundation Trust

The oregon community foundation trust is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf). the trust makes grants that further the mission of ocf which is to improve the lives of all oregonians through the power of…

Philanthropy
4
Oregon Parks Forever

Raising funds for programs and projects that enhance the experience of using oregon's parks and forests.

Environment
5
Oregon Made Creative Foundation

The Oregon Made Creative Foundation supports the efforts of storytellers, filmmakers, and artists statewide to attain sustainable careers in the arts, especially the digital arts. The Foundation, under its #OregonMade banner, strives to…

Arts & Culture
6
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
7
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
8
Central Coast Land Conservancy Inc

The Central Coast Land Conservancy mission is to protect, in perpetuity, the wild spaces and natural heritage of Oregon's Central Coast

Environment
9
Team for Economic Action in Molalla

To build and maintain strong, diverse business districts; to create and retain living wage jobs; and to promote Molalla as a rewarding place to work, live, invest, and shop.

Community Improvement
10
Prineville Downtown Association

Economic development of rural Oregon towns

Community Improvement
11
Oregon Desert Land Trust

To conserve and restore wild and working lands in oregons high desert for wildlife and people, and provide common ground to improve climate resilience, wildlife connectivity, habitat restoration, innovative grazing practices, cultural…

Environment
12
Sw Trails Pdx

SWTrails PDX works to improve hiking trails in southwest Portland. We lead group hikes and have meetings to discuss pedestrian safety issues and trail improvements. We work with State and Local agencies to build and maintain trails. We are…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lower Nehalem Community Trust; the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEARN PRODUCTIONS LLC: $67,000 · OtherLEARN PRODUCTIONS LLCIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,167 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFARI TOWN SURF SHOP: $11,000 · OtherSAFARI TOWN SURF SHOPTOLEDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 · OtherTOLEDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCURRY COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherCURRY COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF TOLEDO: $10,000 · OtherCITY OF TOLEDOOREGON RIDES & EVENTS LLC: $6,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPME: $62,500 · Community ImprovementCOLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC D…Travel Southern Oregon Coast: $21,000 · Community ImprovementTravel Southern Oregon Coas…FOOD ROOTS: $19,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD ROOTSTRAILKEEPERS OF OREGON: $91,708 · EnvironmentTRAILKEEPERS OF OREGONOREGON COAST TRAIL FOUNDATION INC: $7,400 · EnvironmentOREGON COAST TRAIL FOUNDAT…Northwest Trail Alliance Inc: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsOregon State University Foundation: $13,280 · EducationCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND: $10,960 · PhilanthropyLower Nehalem Community Trust: $7,500 · Animals
Other$170,167Community Improvement$102,500Environment$99,108Recreation & Sports$25,000Education$13,280Philanthropy$10,960Animals$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRAILKEEPERS OF OREGON: $91,708 over 1y, 23% of budgetCOLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPME: $62,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNorthwest Trail Alliance Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTravel Southern Oregon Coast: $21,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFOOD ROOTS: $19,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $13,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLower Nehalem Community Trust: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOREGON COAST TRAIL FOUNDATION INC: $7,400 over 1y, 95% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Roundhouse Founda…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Coast Visitors Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Coast Visitors Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Columbia Pacific Economic Developme: 77% of income from government
  • Trailkeepers of Oregon: 19% of income from government
  • Lower Nehalem Community Trust: 2% of income from government
  • Food Roots: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Coast Visitors Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home