Skip to content
Oregon Casa Network at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$751k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$2.4MHuman Services$939kCivil Rights$435kEducation$163kCommunity Improvement$155kArts & Culture$29kHousing & Shelter$7k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$134,568
Median grant
1
States reached
$664k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA FOR CHILDREN OF MULTNOMAH WAS$751,260
CASA OF LANE COUNTY$332,875
CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY$312,549
CASA OF EASTERN OREGON$298,432
CASA OF MARION COUNTY$231,077
CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON$199,996
CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY$188,468
OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION (CASA$155,304
CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY$148,979
COLUMBIA GORGE CASA$134,568
CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN$130,003
UMATILLA MORROW HEAD START (UMATILL$122,255
CASA FOR CHILDREN OF KLAMATH COUNTY$120,482
CASA OF LINN COUNTY$102,886
YAMHILL COUNTY CASA$72,519
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $591k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $200k → 10%BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $33k → 12%CASA OF POLK COUNTY: $5k → 13%CASA OF MARION COUNTY: $231k → 14%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $17k → 10%CASA OF POLK COUNTY: $63k → 13%CASA OF MARION COUNTY: $5k → 14%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $22k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 25 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -38% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$4.0M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-38%

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASA FOR CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $786k · revenue +27% · 30% of their budget
  • CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $347k · revenue +33%
  • CO
    CASA OF LANE COUNTY
    3× · 2017–2025 · $344k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • GC
    Grant-Harney County Casa Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue -38%
  • CO
    CASA OF WALLOWA COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CO
    CASA OF CURRY COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Bastrop Count

The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who provide advocacy services to child victims removed by the state from homes because of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights
4
Casa for Kids Inc

The organization trains community members to become court appointed special advocates who will speak up for the best interest of abused and neglected children in the courts of washington county. casa volunteers review records, research…

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
6
Mineral County Casa Program

Court appointed special advocate

Crime & Legal
7
Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Ocean County Inc

The purpose of casa is to advocate for the best interest of the vulnerable children in foster care. these children have been removed from their homes due to a substantiated case of abuse and neglect. the casa volunteer serves as the…

Crime & Legal
10
Casa of the Rolling Plains

Casa is a program to advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal and foster system.

Crime & Legal
11
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Eastern Oregon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Umatilla-Morrow Headstart Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $785,990 · Civil RightsCASA FOR CHILDREN INCCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $347,185 · Civil RightsCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INCCASA OF LANE COUNTY: $343,571 · Civil RightsCASA OF LANE COUNTYCASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $224,494 · Civil RightsCASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INCCASA-VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $135,134 · Civil RightsCASA-VOICES FOR CHILDRENCASA OF LINN COUNTY INC: $120,750 · Civil RightsCASA OF LINN COUNTY INCYAMHILL COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $93,265 · Civil RightsFrontier CASA: $81,409 · Civil RightsCLATSOP CASA PROGRAM INC: $73,731 · Civil RightsCASA OF EASTERN OREGON INC: $318,867 · Crime & LegalCASA OF EASTERN OREG…COLUMBIA GORGE CASA: $155,003 · Crime & LegalCOLUMBIA GORGE CASACASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $154,110 · Crime & LegalCASA OF CLACKAMAS CO…CASA FOR CHILDREN OF KLAMATH COUNTY: $127,517 · Crime & LegalCASA FOR CHILDREN OF…CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $253,831 · Human ServicesCASA OF CENTRAL …CASA OF MARION COUNTY INC: $236,208 · Human ServicesCASA OF MARION C…CASA OF POLK COUNTY INC: $68,105 · Human ServicesCASA OF POLK COU…BUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $32,627 · Human ServicesBUILDING HEALTHY…FRONTIER CASA - EASTERN OREGON: $67,328 · OtherCASA OF COLUMBIA GORGE: $40,315 · OtherTHE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRANDE R: $28,887 · OtherCASA OF GRANT COUNTY: $27,013 · OtherCASA OF LINCOLN & TILLAMOOK COUNTIES INC: $22,888 · OtherGrant-Harney County Casa Inc: $13,735 · OtherCASA OF KIDS OF KLAMATH COUNTY: $13,711 · OtherCASA OF CLATSOP COUNTY: $13,711 · OtherCASA OF COOS COUNTY: $13,711 · Other+2 more: $10,244 · OtherUMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC: $163,003 · EducationOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $162,339 · Housing & Shelter
Civil Rights$2,205,529Crime & Legal$755,497Human Services$590,771Other$251,543Education$163,003Housing & Shelter$162,339

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $785,990 over 4y, 30% of budgetCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $347,185 over 4y, 24% of budgetCASA OF LANE COUNTY: $343,571 over 3y, 23% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $253,831 over 4y, 22% of budgetCASA OF MARION COUNTY INC: $236,208 over 2y, 46% of budgetCASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $224,494 over 4y, 47% of budgetUMATILLA-MORROW HEADSTART INC: $163,003 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $162,339 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOLUMBIA GORGE CASA: $155,003 over 2y, 33% of budgetCASA-VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $135,134 over 2y, 21% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN OF KLAMATH COUNTY: $127,517 over 2y, 42% of budgetCASA OF LINN COUNTY INC: $120,750 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetYAMHILL COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $93,265 over 4y, 24% of budgetFrontier CASA: $81,409 over 2y, 70% of budgetCLATSOP CASA PROGRAM INC: $73,731 over 2y, 33% of budgetCASA OF POLK COUNTY INC: $68,105 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBUILDING HEALTHY FAMILIES: $32,627 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCASA OF LINCOLN & TILLAMOOK COUNTIES INC: $22,888 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetGrant-Harney County Casa Inc: $13,735 over 1y, 9.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Braemar Charitable Tr…The Roundhouse Founda…The Autzen FoundationThe Ford Family Found…The Healy FoundationNational Court Appoin…Juan Young TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Collins FoundationThe Robert D and Marc…Charis Fund
The Oregon Community FoundationOR38.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Healy Foundation · National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Juan Young Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Charis Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Casa Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Casa Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Oregon Coast Community Action: 85% of income from government
  • Umatilla-Morrow Headstart Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Building Healthy Families: 41% of income from government
  • Casa-Voices for Children: 20% of income from government
  • Yamhill County Casa Program: 3% of income from government
  • Frontier Casa: 2% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon: 2% of income from government
  • Casa of Eastern Oregon Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Casa for Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Casa of Marion County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Douglas County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Columbia Gorge Casa: 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Jackson County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Casa of Linn County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Casa Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home