Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Optimist Club of New Ulm Inc

Charitable and educational purposes to develop optimism as a philosophy of life, utilizing the tenets of the optimist creed; to promote an active interest in good governments and civic affairs; to inspire respect for the law; to promote patriotism and work for international accord and friendship among all people; to aid and encourage the…

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$162kYouth Development$45kHuman Services$35kPhilanthropy$33k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL$15,366
UNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA INC$15,000
BROWN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES$11,500
NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88$10,941
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $22k → 8%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $22k → 8%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $17k → 8%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $16k → 8%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $15k → 8%UNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA INC: $15k → 8%BROWN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $12k → 8%BROWN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $12k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $11k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $10k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $9k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $7k → 8%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH: $7k → 8%NEW ULM AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $6k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTY AREA: $6k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTY AREA: $6k → 8%ST PAULS EV LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $6k → 8%BROWN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $6k → 8%CITY OF NEW ULM: $6k → 8%NEW ULM AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 8%BROWN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES: $6k → 8%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH: $6k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTY AREA: $6k → 8%NEW ULM SCHOOL DISTRICT #88: $5k → 8%RIVERBEND EDUCATION DISTRICT: $5k → 8%RIVER BEND EDUCATION DISTRICT: $5k → 8%UNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTY: $5k → 8%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH: $5k → 8%NEW ULM AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 8%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$269k · 7 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$269k
$6k

Still filing today

14%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH
    5× · 2019–2025 · $75k
  • IS
    INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 88
    7× · 2018–2025 · $72k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA
    5× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue -43%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF NEW ULM
    one grant, 2018 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $74,933 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCHINDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 88 — $71,689 · OtherINDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 88Brown County — $34,500 · OtherBrown CountyHEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH OF BROWN COUNTY INC — $22,500 · OtherHEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH OF BROWN COUNTY INCNEW ULM AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS — $16,952 · OtherNEW ULM AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLSRIVERBEND EDUCATION DISTRICT — $10,339 · Other+1 more — $5,951 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA — $37,890 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF T…
Other$236,864Philanthropy$37,890

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA — $37,890 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH OF BROWN COUNTY INC — $22,500 over 4y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BROWN COUNTY AREA
  • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES HEALTHY YOUTH OF BROWN COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southern Minnesota Initiative FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Optimist Club of New Ulm Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Optimist Club of New Ulm Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Optimist Club of New Ulm Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph