Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$80,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$320,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 18
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$17M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$1.5M7%
FY202413$947k8%
FY202314$982k7%
FY202218$999k17%
FY202115$825k0%
FY202015$825k7%
FY201915$821k0%
FY201815$789k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.8MEducation$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.5MYouth Development$1.1MRecreation & Sports$682kHuman Services$676kReligion$658kCivil Rights$451kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc$1,230,00090%
Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc$1,038,90091%
The Educational Alliance Inc$590,00090%
Cancer Care Inc$560,00061%
National Ramah Commission Inc$555,00091%
Keshet Inc$451,00092%
Mount Sinai Health System Inc$295,00030%
Board of Jewish Education Inc$250,00030%
Chai Lifeline Inc$220,00080%
Matan Inc$220,00087%
Jbi International Inc$195,00091%
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association$145,00060%
Jewish Community Center of Si Inc$127,00040%
Project Lead Inc$45,00068%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.5M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc: $1,230,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Jewish Camp Inc: $1,038,900 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetThe Educational Alliance Inc: $590,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $560,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNational Ramah Commission Inc: $555,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetKeshet Inc: $451,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetMount Sinai Health System Inc: $295,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBoard of Jewish Education Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetChai Lifeline Inc: $220,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMatan Inc: $220,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetJbi International Inc: $195,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetThe Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association: $145,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Community Center of Si Inc: $127,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetProject Lead Inc: $45,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 with peer funders

About Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004

How much does Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 give?
Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 reported 14 grants totaling $1,471,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 18 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (21%), Education (20%), Philanthropy (17%).
Who are Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc ($1.2M), Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc ($1.0M), The Educational Alliance Inc ($590k).
Does Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 based?
Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oppenheimer&Haas Xxxxx1004’s filings →

More from the funding graph