Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Opa Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k6 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $99k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$13,500
CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$12,500
HOPECAM INC$12,500
HARVESTERS FOOD NETWORK$10,588
KIDS TLC$10,000
AFIA INSTITUTE FOR FEED EDUCATION AND RESEARCH$10,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST KANSAS$10,000
CITY UNION MISSION$10,000
ROSE BROOKS$10,000
GIVING THE BASICS$3,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$525
LENEXA BAPTIST CHURCH$500
KVC KANSAS$500
THE RESCUE PROJECT$180
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
4
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
7
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Rosecrance Inc

Rosecrance provides help, hope and lasting recovery to children, youth, adults and families.

10
Kids in Distress Inc

The mission of the corporation is to prevent child abuse, preserve the family, and treat children who have been abused and neglected.

Human Services
11
Crisis Text Line Inc

By leveraging innovative technology and research, we are shaping mental health policy and systems to create a world where everyone has access to the support they need anytime, anywhere.

Health
12
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Emergency Relief International and the most unlike its peers is The Rescue Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPECAM INC — $12,500 · OtherHOPECAM INCHARVESTERS FOOD NETWORK — $10,588 · OtherHARVESTERS FOOD NETWORKROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $10,000 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INCCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST KANSAS — $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST KANSASKIDSTLC INC — $10,000 · OtherKIDSTLC INCGIVING THE BASICS INC — $3,200 · OtherGIVING THE BASICS INC+3 more — $2,000 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $13,500 · Human ServicesAmerican Natio…CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $12,500 · InternationalCHILDREN'S EM…INSTITUTE FOR FEED EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $10,000 · AnimalsINSTITUTE …+1 more — $180 · AnimalsCity Union Mission — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCity Union…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $525 · Health
Other$58,288Human Services$13,500International$12,500Animals$10,180Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$525

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPECAM INC — $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $12,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCity Union Mission — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSTLC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FEED EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC — $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Opa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph