Skip to content

· Public charity

Oorah Inc

Oorah was established as a jewish outreach organization for the purpose of imparting education,values and traditions, as well as guidance and support, to children who lack access to these fundamentals.

$10.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$667k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$11MHuman Services$31k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $777,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,960,563 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,183,363 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $667k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$219M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION OORAH$667,150
KHAL BNEI TORAH$50,000
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA$35,000
YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH$20,000
YESHIVA OF STATEN ISLAND$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $8.6M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$8.6M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 4 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$7.6M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+3%

Still filing today

25%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CONGREGATION OORAH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $7.5M
  • YC
    YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $59k
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • JF
    JUNK FOR JOY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1.4M · revenue -96% · 59% of their budget
  • K4
    KARS 4 KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M · revenue +3%
  • KI
    KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Ohr Torah

Promoting education by providing financial assistance and support services to educational organizations worldwide; to promote the jewish religion and jewish education through provision of educational programs, assisting the creation of…

Philanthropy
5
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
6
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
7
Kollel Bais Yosef Inc

To expend, contribute, and otherwise dispose of its money, and other property to further jewish religious scholarship by contributing to or otherwise voluntarily financially assisting needy religious institutions, or students, both in the…

Religion
8
Yakar Foundation Inc
—
9
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
10
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc; the most unlike its peers is Davis Memorial Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION OORAH: $7,481,153 · OtherCONGREGATION OORAH+11 more: $569,716 · Other+11 moreJUNK FOR JOY INC: $1,384,134 · Arts & CultureJUNK FOR JOY I…KARS 4 KIDS INC: $1,253,186 · PhilanthropyKARS 4 KIDS I…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 · ReligionYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $10,000 · ReligionKEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC: $5,300 · ReligionSTATEN ISLAND YESHIVA INC: $5,050 · ReligionDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$8,050,869Arts & Culture$1,384,134Philanthropy$1,263,186Religion$38,150Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUNK FOR JOY INC: $1,384,134 over 1y, 59% of budgetKARS 4 KIDS INC: $1,253,186 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $181,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMORESHET BAT SHEVA - ORCHOT YOSHER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC: $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNK FOR JOY INC ↗
  • Who funds KARS 4 KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC ↗
  • Who funds MORESHET BAT SHEVA - ORCHOT YOSHER ↗
  • Who funds KEREM BAIS YAAKOV SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds STATEN ISLAND YESHIVA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oorah Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oorah Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Kars 4 Kids Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oorah Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oorah Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oorah’s filings →

More from the funding graph