Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Washington · Public charity

Olympic Kennel Club Inc

Promotion of pure-bred dogs, dog shows and prevention of cruelty to animals.

$11k
Granted FY2021
6
Itemized grants FY2021
6
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2021
$10k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 7
FY2019 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
3
Total assets, FY2021
$195k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations Olympic Kennel Club Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
AnimalsPhilanthropy
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20216$10k0%
FY20207$11k29%
FY20197$17kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Animals$32kYouth Development$3kEducation$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$400

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine$20,0003n/a
The AKC Humane Fund Inc$4,40021%
National Animal Interest Alliance$3,50030%
National 4-H Council$2,61510%
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation$2,00020%
Elements of Education Partners$2,00020%
Dogs for the Deaf Inc Dba Dogs for Better Lives$1,90030%
Kyle S Legacy Inc$1,80032%
Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc$40010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Olympic Kennel Club Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe AKC Humane Fund Inc: $4,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNational Animal Interest Alliance: $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNational 4-H Council: $2,615 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElements of Education Partners: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDogs for the Deaf Inc Dba Dogs for Better Lives: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKyle S Legacy Inc: $1,800 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGuide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Olympic Kennel Club Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Olympic Kennel Club Inc?

Find your warmest path to Olympic Kennel Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Olympic Kennel Club Inc

How much does Olympic Kennel Club Inc give?
Olympic Kennel Club Inc reported 6 itemized grants totaling $9,900, out of $10,900 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 7 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2021.
What does Olympic Kennel Club Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2021, its largest causes are Animals (82%), Youth Development (7%), Education (5%).
Who are Olympic Kennel Club Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2021: Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine ($20k), The AKC Humane Fund Inc ($4k), National Animal Interest Alliance ($4k).
Does Olympic Kennel Club Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Olympic Kennel Club Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Blackbaud Giving Fund, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Olympic Kennel Club Inc based?
Olympic Kennel Club Inc is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Olympic Kennel Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home