Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Olive a Stokes Scholarship Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$477k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$591k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $473k
$112,829
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE$247,658
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$112,829
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$112,829
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL$2,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1k → 16%LEE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%MEREDITH COLLEGE: $700 → 8%UNC CHARLOTTE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%LOUISBURG COLLEGE: $300 → 11%NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $1k → 12%BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $3k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $248k → 15%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $300 → 15%FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $300 → 16%PITT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $600 → 20%BARTON COLLEGE: $1k → 20%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW: $600 → 16%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $700 → 22%MEREDITH COLLEGE: $500 → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $700 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $2k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $21k → 15%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $800 → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 20%BARTON COLLEGE: $800 → 20%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $700 → 15%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $500 → 22%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $1k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $15k → 15%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $600 → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $113k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $500 → 13%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $12k → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $12k → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $3k → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $500 → 20%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%NASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%NASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $600 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$580k · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$580k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $311k · revenue -8%
  • EC
    EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $124k
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $123k

Funded once

  • UC
    UNC CHARLOTTE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • LU
    LEE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +9%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
9
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
10
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
11
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
12
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barton College and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC — $310,508 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC+5 more — $7,200 · EducationEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY — $124,479 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY — $123,279 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY+16 more — $25,650 · Other+16 more
Education$317,708Other$273,408

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC — $310,508 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARTON COLLEGE — $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEREDITH COLLEGE — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEE UNIVERSITY — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISBURG COLLEGE — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds BARTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds LEE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds LOUISBURG COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities Inc · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Olive a Stokes Scholarship Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph