Skip to content

· Private foundation

Olin B and Desta Schwab Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.6MYouth Development$1.4MCommunity Improvement$739kPhilanthropy$98kEmployment$75kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN$50,000
BLOOM PROJECT INC$45,000
BELIEVE IN A DREAM$40,000
EUELL WILSON CENTER$20,000
BUILDING A STRONGER FAMILY$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN$6,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER FORT WAYNE$5,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER FORT WAYNE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 9 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$4.6M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
0%

Still filing today

44%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +89%
  • BI
    Believe in a Dream Inc
    3× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +92%
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • NI
    NE IN REGIONAL MKTG PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
  • NW
    NEI WORKS
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • SA
    SOUTHWEST ALLEN CO SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2019 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
2
Education for Tomorrow Alliance

Education for tomorrow alliance's mission is to cultivate education and community partnerships that advance student success. with innovative programs focused on career, leadership, and stem preparation, efta is the portal through which…

Education
3
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
4
Junior Achievement of Greater South Carolina Inc

Junior achievement of greater south carolina (jagsc) is dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people to thrive in a global economy. through innovative learning experiences, ja focuses on three core areas: financial literacy,…

International
5
Indianapolis Private Industry Council

The indianapolis private industry council, inc., doing business as employindy, the workforce investment board for marion county, is a not-for-profit corporation responsible for the development of the marion county workforce. employindy…

Employment
6
Junior Achievement of Central Florida Inc

Jacf empowers students to economic success by delivering innovative, experiential learning programs in fin literacy, career readiness, and entrepreneurship. partnerships with educators and business leaders inspire and prepare students to…

International
7
Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership Inc

The northeast indiana regional partnership, inc. (partnership) mission is to drive business investment and strengthen northeast indiana's global competitiveness and economic resilency. through its combined efforts the partnership supports…

—
8
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
9
Alliance for Strategic Growth Inc

The mission of alliance for strategic growth, inc. is to empower the eastern indiana workforce to meet existing and future sector-driven employment demands.

Employment
10
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Urban League Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bloom Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,208,000 · OtherIVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGEREGION 8 EDUCATION SERVICE CTR: $1,079,535 · OtherREGION 8 EDUCATION SERVICE CTRNORTHEAST INDIANA FUND: $645,500 · OtherNORTHEAST INDIANA FUNDREGION 8 EDUCATION: $202,626 · OtherREGION 8 EDUCATION+11 more: $416,000 · Other+11 moreJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $1,127,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NOR…Believe in a Dream Inc: $109,500 · EducationINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationNORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $87,500 · Community ImprovementThe Bloom Project Inc: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentEUELL A WILSON CENTER INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $13,550 · Human Services
Other$3,551,661International$1,127,000Education$134,750Community Improvement$87,500Youth Development$70,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Human Services$13,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $1,127,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetBelieve in a Dream Inc: $109,500 over 3y, 25% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $87,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetThe Bloom Project Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $13,550 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE YOUTHEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTaylor University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC ↗
  • Who funds Believe in a Dream Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Bloom Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds EUELL A WILSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE YOUTHEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Taylor University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Waterfield Foundation IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Waterfield Foundation Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Surack Family Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Olin B and Desta Schwab Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Olin B and Desta Schwab Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Olin B and Desta Schwab’s filings →

    More from the funding graph