Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Olin B and Desta Schwab Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.6MYouth Development$1.4MCommunity Improvement$739kPhilanthropy$98kEmployment$75kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN$50,000
BLOOM PROJECT INC$45,000
BELIEVE IN A DREAM$40,000
EUELL WILSON CENTER$20,000
BUILDING A STRONGER FAMILY$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN$6,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER FORT WAYNE$5,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER FORT WAYNE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 9 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$4.6M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
0%

Still filing today

44%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +89%
  • BI
    Believe in a Dream Inc
    3× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +92%
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • NI
    NE IN REGIONAL MKTG PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
  • NW
    NEI WORKS
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • SA
    SOUTHWEST ALLEN CO SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2019 · $38k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
2
Education for Tomorrow Alliance

Education for tomorrow alliance's mission is to cultivate education and community partnerships that advance student success. with innovative programs focused on career, leadership, and stem preparation, efta is the portal through which…

Education
3
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
4
Junior Achievement of Greater South Carolina Inc

Junior achievement of greater south carolina (jagsc) is dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people to thrive in a global economy. through innovative learning experiences, ja focuses on three core areas: financial literacy,…

International
5
Indianapolis Private Industry Council

The indianapolis private industry council, inc., doing business as employindy, the workforce investment board for marion county, is a not-for-profit corporation responsible for the development of the marion county workforce. employindy…

Employment
6
Junior Achievement of Central Florida Inc

Jacf empowers students to economic success by delivering innovative, experiential learning programs in fin literacy, career readiness, and entrepreneurship. partnerships with educators and business leaders inspire and prepare students to…

International
7
Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership Inc

The northeast indiana regional partnership, inc. (partnership) mission is to drive business investment and strengthen northeast indiana's global competitiveness and economic resilency. through its combined efforts the partnership supports…

8
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

9
Alliance for Strategic Growth Inc

The mission of alliance for strategic growth, inc. is to empower the eastern indiana workforce to meet existing and future sector-driven employment demands.

Employment
10
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Urban League Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Bloom Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $1,208,000 · OtherIVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGEREGION 8 EDUCATION SERVICE CTR — $1,079,535 · OtherREGION 8 EDUCATION SERVICE CTRNORTHEAST INDIANA FUND — $645,500 · OtherNORTHEAST INDIANA FUNDREGION 8 EDUCATION — $202,626 · OtherREGION 8 EDUCATION+11 more — $416,000 · Other+11 moreJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC — $1,127,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NOR…Believe in a Dream Inc — $109,500 · EducationINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationNORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC — $87,500 · Community ImprovementThe Bloom Project Inc — $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentEUELL A WILSON CENTER INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC — $13,550 · Human Services
Other$3,551,661International$1,127,000Education$134,750Community Improvement$87,500Youth Development$70,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Human Services$13,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC — $1,127,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetBelieve in a Dream Inc — $109,500 over 3y, 25% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC — $87,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetThe Bloom Project Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC — $13,550 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFORT WAYNE YOUTHEATRE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTaylor University — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC
  • Who funds Believe in a Dream Inc
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Bloom Project Inc
  • Who funds INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds EUELL A WILSON CENTER INC
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE YOUTHEATRE INC
  • Who funds Taylor University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Waterfield Foundation IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Waterfield Foundation Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Surack Family Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Olin B and Desta Schwab Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph