Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oldham Little Church Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
129
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$8.5MHuman Services$401kHousing & Shelter$396kEducation$240kYouth Development$206kInternational$138kPublic Safety & Disaster$89kCommunity Improvement$82kOther$0
02FY2024 · 129 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $169k
  • $10k–50k105 grants · $1.5M
$14,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
South Union Missionary Baptist Church$45,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Houston Christian University (formerly HBU)$25,000
Brookstone Church$25,000
Rio Grande Bible Institute Inc$20,000
Vine Street Baptist Church$18,000
The Freedom Worship Center Inc$18,000
As Our Own$18,000
Tecumseh Church of the Nazarene$17,000
Grace Baptist Church$16,000
Peoples Community CME Church$16,000
Rock Springs CME Church$16,000
Rochester Baptist Church$15,500
Westlake Community Church of God$15,500
Mt Zion Missionary Baptist Church$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Heart of Texas Foundation: $55k → 15%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition: $20k → 17%Heart of Texas Foundation: $45k → 15%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition: $13k → 17%Heart of Texas Foundation Inc: $44k → 15%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition: $13k → 17%Come Over Ministry Inc: $5k → 13%Heart of Texas Foundation: $30k → 15%Heart of Texas Foundation: $20k → 15%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition: $13k → 17%Heart of Texas Foundation: $11k → 15%Heart of Texas Foundation: $10k → 15%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalitio: $5k → 17%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 65 repeat orgs$8.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 96 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
686

Total granted

$2.2M
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+4%

Still filing today

29%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $215k · revenue +20%
  • AO
    AS OUR OWN NFP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +22%
  • WH
    WORLD HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2018–2024 · $63k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • LB
    LIGHTHOUSE BAPTIST CHAPEL
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • PS
    Project Savvy
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -63%
  • HC
    HOUSTON CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvest Intercontinental Church Houston

Faith based organization church

Religion
2
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
3
Hope Christian Ministries International

Ministries

Religion
4
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
5
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
6
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
7
Villagehouston of the Assemblies of God

Christian nbsp;innercity nbsp;community nbsp;outreach nbsp;ministry

—
8
Faith Bible Church Atx

The church exists to glorify God and make disciples of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
Praveen Evangelisitc Ministries

Ministries church

Religion
10
Teaching Ministry of the Word of Truth

A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.

Religion
11
House of Hope Ministry Inc

Church organization

Religion
12
Empty Tomb Ministries

To go and make disciples of all nations, in the name and power of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.We are committed to proclaim, challenge, encourage and minister the Gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the nations.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Centers of Houston; the most unlike its peers is Project Savvy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 847 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+183 more: $3,465,458 · Other+183 moreHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY: $214,800 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS SHELTERING ARMS COALITION: $67,500 · Human ServicesHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT ONE DAY: $20,000 · Human ServicesLovesick Ministries: $60,000 · ReligionMISSIONINVEST USA: $50,000 · ReligionThe For All Mankind Movement Inc: $33,000 · ReligionProject Savvy: $25,000 · ReligionUNION BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · ReligionEmerging Grace Ministries Inc: $15,000 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Tyndale House Cambridge Inc: $14,300 · ReligionCHARACTER CAMP: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentEyes On Me Inc: $55,500 · Youth DevelopmentAS OUR OWN NFP: $100,850 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $47,500 · EducationRIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTE INC: $38,000 · EducationHOPE INC: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,465,458Human Services$322,300Religion$217,300Youth Development$120,500International$100,850Education$85,500Crime & Legal$30,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY: $214,800 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetAS OUR OWN NFP: $100,850 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetEAST TEXAS SHELTERING ARMS COALITION: $67,500 over 5y, 26% of budgetCHARACTER CAMP: $65,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetWORLD HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $62,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLovesick Ministries: $60,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetYOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC: $57,558 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetEyes On Me Inc: $55,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMISSIONINVEST USA: $50,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTE INC: $38,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe For All Mankind Movement Inc: $33,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION CENTERS OF HOUSTON: $30,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetProject Savvy: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetPROJECT ONE DAY: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNION BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEmerging Grace Ministries Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tyndale House Cambridge Inc: $14,300 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART OF TEXAS FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds AS OUR OWN NFP ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS SHELTERING ARMS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CHARACTER CAMP ↗
  • Who funds WORLD HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Lovesick Ministries ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Eyes On Me Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONINVEST USA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The For All Mankind Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CENTERS OF HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Savvy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stoller FoundationTX21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stoller Foundation · The Awe and Wonder Foundation · Jehovah - Jireh Foundation · The Cross Foundation · ESB3 Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Indianapolis Center for Congregations Inc · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oldham Little Church Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oldham Little Church Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oldham Little Church Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Oldham Little Church Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 847 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oldham Little Church’s filings →

    More from the funding graph