Skip to content
Older Adults Technology Services at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Older Adults Technology Services

The organization's mission is to harness the power of technology to change the way we age.

$522k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$423kEmployment$381kFood & Nutrition$298kHuman Services$297kCommunity Improvement$72kHealth$46kEnvironment$40kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $489,320, the rows itemized in this filing. The $521,820 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $432k
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jo-Carroll Energy Inc (NFP)$30,000
Cris Healthy Aging$30,000
Senior Citizens Of Greater Dallas Inc$23,000
Fresno County Economic Opportunities$20,000
East Harris County Empowerment Council$20,000
Little Brothers Friends Of The Elderly Boston Inc$20,000
Senior Adult Activity Center Of The Phoenixville Area$20,000
Indiana University$16,500
Heritage Place Of Indianapolis Inc$16,500
Goodwill Industries Of Southwest Florida$14,160
City Of Dunedin$11,660
Tippecanoe County Council On Aging$10,000
Vermont Slauson Economic Development Co$10,000
Meals On Wheels People$10,000
Kingman-Millcreek Public Library$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $321k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Little Brothers Friends Of The Elderly Boston Inc: $20k → 16%Senior Coastsiders: $10k → 7%Jewish Family Service of San Diego: $10k → 11%Area 1 Agency On Aging: $10k → 18%Fresno County Economic Opportunities: $50k → 19%Austin Area Urban League Inc: $6k → 10%Brookland Center For Community Economic Change: $6k → 11%Connections Area Agency On Aging Inc: $7k → 12%Midland County Council On Aging: $10k → 9%Senior Renaissance Center: $10k → 14%Caldwell Senior Center Inc: $20k → 16%Athens Community Council on Aging Inc: $15k → 27%Tippecanoe County Council On Aging: $10k → 19%Northshore Senior Center: $10k → 9%Association House Of Chicago: $10k → 14%Little Brothers Friends of the Elderly: $10k → 16%Vivalon: $10k → 8%Fresno County Economic Opportunities: $20k → 19%Impact Hub Houston: $20k → 16%Connections Area Agency On Aging Inc: $5k → 12%Serving Older Adults Of Southeast WI Inc: $7k → 17%Thrive New Orleans: $15k → 23%Impact Hub Houston: $6k → 16%Serving Older Adults of Southeast Wisconsin: $5k → 17%Center in the Park: $20k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$672k · 26 repeat orgs$935k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
43

Total granted

$672k
$619k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+17%

Still filing today

81%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Senior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area
    2× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • FM
    FILL MY CUP
    2× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +145% · 30% of their budget
  • IH
    IMPACT HUB HOUSTON
    2× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SA
    Southern Adirondack Library System
    one grant, 2022 · $56k
  • CL
    CLINTON-ESSEX-FRANKLIN LIBRARY SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +29%
  • RD
    REBUILD DURHAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
2
Lancaster County Council On Aging

The mission of the lancaster county council on aging is to provide a system of coordinated and comprehensive services to enable older persons of lancaster county to continue to maintain their independence.

Human Services
3
Senior Adult Services

Yo provide services to senior adults that improve their quality of life and prevent premature institutionalization through good nutrition, health screening and socialization.

Human Services
4
National Asian Pacific Center on Aging

Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.

—
5
Spark Senior Centers of Montco

To provide access to programs and services that help older adults liveindependently and remain active

Human Services
6
Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aging

The SCVCOA and the Senior Center currently serves more than 10,000 individuals annually through varied programming for the Santa Clarita Valley and Antelope Valley that includes but is not limited to: congregate and home delivered meals…

Human Services
7
Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

—
8
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
9
Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services
10
Fayette County Commission On Aging Incorporated

The fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and above, and providing the…

—
11
Adult Care Center of Central Virginia Inc

Adult day care for frail older adults, particularly those suffering from some form of dementia.

—
12
Adult Enrichment Centers Inc

At Adult Enrichment Centers, we engage adults of all abilities in community programs that promote inclusion and independence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Links Foundation Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is 3 Leaf Literacy Leadership and Learning Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/69
Grantees still filing
39/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southern Adirondack Library System: $56,000 · OtherSouthern Adirondack Library SystemSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $49,000 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INCSenior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area: $40,000 · OtherJo-Carroll Energy Inc (NFP): $30,000 · OtherCRIS Healthy Aging: $30,000 · Other+46 more: $598,800 · Other+46 moreFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $70,000 · Human ServicesFresno County Economic O…LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY - BOSTON INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS …IMPACT HUB HOUSTON: $26,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT HUB HOUSTONBROOKLAND CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC CHANGE: $25,500 · Human ServicesBROOKLAND CENTER FOR COM…CALDWELL SENIOR CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCALDWELL SENIOR CENTER I…CENTER IN THE PARK: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER IN THE PARKATHENS COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVE NEW ORLEANS: $15,000 · Human ServicesSERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $11,660 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $11,660 · Human Services+11 more: $102,000 · Human Services+11 moreORLANDO COMMUNITY & YOUTH TRUST INC: $61,660 · EducationORLANDO COMMUNITY …CLINTON-ESSEX-FRANKLIN LIBRARY SYSTEM: $28,500 · EducationCLINTON-ESSEX-FRAN…FILL MY CUP: $26,000 · EducationFILL MY CUPMID-STATE LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $26,000 · EducationMID-STATE LITERACY…DELAWARE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL: $26,000 · EducationDELAWARE COUNTY LI…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $21,000 · EducationTemple University …RICHARDSON ADULT LITERACY CENTER: $20,000 · EducationRICHARDSON ADULT L…THE SHAW UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE SHAW UNIVERSIT…WINTER PARK LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $11,660 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationLearn - Lifelong Education and Aging Resource Network Inc: $10,000 · EducationTRANSFORMATION WACO: $10,000 · EducationALL HANDS CULTURAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,000 · Community ImprovementEAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL: $20,000 · Community ImprovementASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFriends of Parkside: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA WORKS INC: $26,000 · EmploymentBROAD RIVER BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $21,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SW FLORIDA INC: $14,160 · EmploymentHeritage Place of Indianapolis Inc: $21,660 · Housing & ShelterTHE OAKS AT BARTLETT: $11,660 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE COUNCIL SOUTH: $20,000 · Civil RightsPARS EQUALITY CENTER: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$803,800Human Services$346,820Education$265,820Community Improvement$66,000Employment$61,160Housing & Shelter$33,320Civil Rights$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO COMMUNITY & YOUTH TRUST INC: $61,660 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $49,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSenior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area: $40,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY - BOSTON INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCLINTON-ESSEX-FRANKLIN LIBRARY SYSTEM: $28,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFILL MY CUP: $26,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetIMPACT HUB HOUSTON: $26,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetBlack Business Alliance- Peoria Chapter: $26,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetMID-STATE LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $26,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA WORKS INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL: $26,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetALL HANDS CULTURAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetBROOKLAND CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC CHANGE: $25,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHeritage Place of Indianapolis Inc: $21,660 over 2y, 17% of budgetDURHAM CENTER FOR SENIOR LIFE: $21,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MARICOPA COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCALDWELL SENIOR CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE COUNCIL SOUTH: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRICHARDSON ADULT LITERACY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER IN THE PARK: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY LIBRARY SYSTEM: $15,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SHAW UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHENS COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE NEW ORLEANS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE SUN COAST INC: $11,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $11,660 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OAKS AT BARTLETT: $11,660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER PARK LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $11,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $11,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPECANOE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMIDLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetESPERANZA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR RENAISSANCE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetLearn - Lifelong Education and Aging Resource Network Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetVERMONT-SLAUSON LDC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSoutheast Gwinnett Cooperative Ministry Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAREA 1 AGENCY ON AGING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AARP FoundationMeals on Wheels Ameri…Proliteracy WorldwideDollar General Litera…Truist Foundation IncNational Council on A…Wells Fargo FoundationCenter for Technology…Duke Energy FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…
AARP FoundationDC40.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AARP Foundation · Meals on Wheels America · Proliteracy Worldwide · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · National Council on Aging Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Duke Energy Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Older Adults Technology Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Older Adults Technology Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Older Adults Technology Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home