Skip to content
Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc

The catalyst ed fund (cef) is a unique tax credit program that allows businesses to directly support innovative educational programs in oklahoma's rural public schools.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$194k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$3.3M
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $992k
$56,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EUFAULA PUBLIC SCHOOL$194,000
WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL$194,000
JOHN REX CHARTER SCHOOL$144,467
GRANITE PUBLIC SCHOOL$126,100
PERRY PUBLIC SCHOOL$120,000
TEMPLE PUBLIC SCHOOL$79,900
DRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOL$77,600
NOBLE PUBLIC SCHOOL$56,000
TIMBERLAKE PUBLIC SCHOOL$48,500
MILLWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$38,800
FRANCIS TUTTLE TECHNOLOGY CENTER$32,333
CUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL$19,400
SANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC$16,490
CHISHOLM PUBLIC SCHOOL$14,550
ALLEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%EL RENO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 9%WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL: $194k → 10%PERRY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $120k → 12%RINGWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL: $30k → 12%HARDESTY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 13%NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL: $100k → 13%MARIETTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $33k → 14%PAWHUSKA PUBLIC SHCOOLS: $135k → 14%ALLEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7k → 14%DRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOL: $85k → 15%TULSA HONOR ACADEMY: $10k → 15%PLAINVIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL: $65k → 16%CHISHOLM PUBLIC SCHOOL: $15k → 16%CLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $13k → 16%JOHN REX CHARTER SCHOOL: $144k → 16%BOISE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 17%CANUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $78k → 17%TIMBERLAKE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $49k → 18%TEMPLE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $80k → 19%MCLOUD PUBLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 19%CUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL: $19k → 19%EUFAULA PUBLIC SCHOOL: $194k → 21%GRANITE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $126k → 23%WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL: $135k → 10%NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL: $100k → 13%PAWHUSKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $133k → 14%ALLEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2k → 14%DRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOL: $78k → 15%PLAINVIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL: $65k → 16%JOHN REX CHARTER SCHOOL: $90k → 16%BOISE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 17%CARLTON LANDING ACADEMY: $103k → 21%MANGUM PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $14k → 23%WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $106k → 10%NOBLE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $56k → 13%PAWHUSKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $133k → 14%FRANCIS TUTTLE TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $32k → 16%PAWHUSKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $130k → 14%SANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC: $16k → 16%MILLWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $39k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$2.2M
$446k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+248%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $746k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Pawhuska Public School Foundation Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $531k · revenue +15%
  • CP
    CHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $245k · revenue +61%
  • JW
    JOHN W REX CHARTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $244k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • WP
    WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $106k
  • CL
    CARLTON LANDING ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $103k · revenue -3%
  • CP
    CANUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $78k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Gateway Elementary School

Operation of a charter school in oklahoma

—
2
Harding Charter Preparatory School District

Operation of three charter schools in the oklahoma city area

Education
3
Oklahoma Connections Academy Inc

Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.

Education
4
Kipp Okc Public Schools Inc

Operation of charter school

Education
5
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
6
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
7
Le Monde International Charter Scho

Operation of a charter school in norman oklahoma

Education
8
Hallsville Isd Education Foundation

The foundation provides classroom and teacher grants and student scholarships for students at Hallsville Independent School District.

Education
9
Christian Heritage Academy

The school provides primary, secondary, and special needs education in addition to extended care programs and home schooling opportunities, all within a christian world view.

Education
10
Langston Hughes Academy for Arts and Technology

Operation of a charter school in the tulsa area.

—
11
Cherokee Education Foundation

Support cherokee community schools

Education
12
Yukon Public Schools Foundation for Excellence

Provide teacher grants to help encourage & improve education of children in the yukon public school district

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Academies of Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hennessey Educational School Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL: $329,360 · OtherWASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLCHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $245,129 · OtherCHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIONNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $200,000 · OtherNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSEUFAULA PUBLIC SCHOOL: $194,000 · OtherEUFAULA PUBLIC SCHOOLDRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOL: $162,960 · OtherDRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOLPLAINVIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL: $130,000 · OtherPLAINVIEW PUBLIC SCHOOLGRANITE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $126,100 · OtherGRANITE PUBLIC SCHOOLPERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $120,000 · OtherPERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLSWASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $106,000 · OtherBOISE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherTEMPLE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $79,900 · OtherCANUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $77,600 · Other+13 more: $367,941 · Other+13 moreJOHN W REX CHARTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $244,054 · EducationJOHN W REX CHARTER …THE ACADEMIES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $200,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMIES OF OK…CARLTON LANDING ACADEMY INC: $102,587 · EducationCARLTON LANDING ACA…+2 more: $26,490 · EducationPawhuska Public School Foundation Inc: $530,700 · PhilanthropyPawhuska Public S…
Other$2,238,990Education$573,131Philanthropy$530,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $245,129 over 2y, 14% of budgetJOHN W REX CHARTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $244,054 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ACADEMIES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $200,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCARLTON LANDING ACADEMY INC: $102,587 over 1y, 10% of budgetSANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC: $16,490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pawhuska Public School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICKASHA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN W REX CHARTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMIES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CARLTON LANDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds El Reno Public School Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feed the Children IncOklahoma Educational …Oklahoma Public Schoo…Communities Foundatio…Justin J Watt Foundat…Oklahoma City Communi…Amazonsmile Foundation
Feed the Children IncOK31× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feed the Children Inc · Oklahoma Educational Technology Trust · Oklahoma Public School Resource Center · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Carlton Landing Academy Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Eigo’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home