Skip to content
Oklahoma Allergy Clinic Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Oklahoma Allergy Clinic Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$50kArts & Culture$40kEducation$8kHealth$4kAnimals$3kHuman Services$350Housing & Shelter$330Food & Nutrition$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$9,000
ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$2,500
LYRIC THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA$500
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIO$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $200 → 14%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $250 → 16%THE RECOVERY CENTER: $1k → 16%VERNON FILLEY ART MUSEUM: $500 → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $200 → 15%MLV FOUNDATION: $150 → 18%BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $200 → 8%THE RECOVERY CENTER: $1k → 16%LYRIC THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA: $500 → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%OKC PHILHARMONIC: $3k → 16%OKC PHILHARMONIC: $3k → 16%OKC PHILHARMONIC: $3k → 16%OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART: $915 → 16%OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART: $260 → 16%THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION: $350 → 16%THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION: $300 → 16%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $250 → 16%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $200 → 16%CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION: $300 → 16%CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION: $135 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$101k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+116%

Still filing today

80%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +38%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +77%
  • TT
    THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $650 · revenue +463%

Funded once

  • OZ
    OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +116%
  • VF
    VERNON FILLEY ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2024 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Oklahoma Arts Institute Foundation

To support, promote, and improve the programs and services of the oklahoma arts institute.

Arts & Culture
5
Oklahoma Optometric Association

The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

—
6
Oklahoma Contemporary Arts Center Inc

Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.

Arts & Culture
7
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
8
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
9
Oklahoma City Public Schools Foundation Inc

We are the leading advocate for okcps. we strengthen our schools through community investment, strategic partnerships, and innovative programs.

Education
10
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
11
Oklahoma City Art Museum Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation through distributions made to the oklahoma city museum of art.

Arts & Culture
12
Delta Dental of Oklahoma Foundation

Improve the oral health of all oklahomans by increasing access to dental care, funding oral health education and supporting organizations who serve vital oral health needs in our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brightfocus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc+1 more: $650 · PhilanthropyALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INCOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $1,175 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual g…THE RECOVERY CENTER: $2,000 · OtherTHE RECOVERY…VERNON FILLEY ART MUSEUM: $500 · Other+4 more: $800 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · EducationOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,620 · AnimalsCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $435 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $330 · Youth DevelopmentOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $450 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $200 · Health
Philanthropy$50,650Arts & Culture$31,675Other$11,300Education$7,500Animals$2,620Youth Development$765Health$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,620 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $1,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…American Fidelity Fou…Kirkpatrick Foundatio…Tom and Brenda McDani…Clements Foods Founda…Vose Foundation IncAd Astra FoundationThe Ann Lacy Foundati…The Jada FoundationRainbolt Family Found…Fred Jones Family Fou…Bowen Foundation
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Tom and Brenda McDaniel Charitable Found · Clements Foods Foundation · Vose Foundation Inc · Ad Astra Foundation · The Ann Lacy Foundation · The Jada Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Allergy Clinic Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Allergy Clinic Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oklahoma Allergy Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home