Loading…
· Private foundation
OGILVIE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$14k
Granted FY2025
10
Grants
3
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.
Human Services$8kHousing & Shelter$6kAnimals$5kEmployment$4kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$2kOther$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$279k
Total assets
Largest grants
- COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET$1,500
- SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY$1,500
- WISCONSIN VETERANS VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC$1,500
- HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS$1,500
- BELONG FOX VALLEY$1,500
- FOX CITIES VICTIM CRISIS RESPONSE TEAM$1,500
- BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS$1,500
- LEAVEN$1,500
- LAKESHORE CHARITIES INC$750
- HORTONVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC$750
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24k · 6 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
7
Total granted
$24k
$10k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+26%
+34%
Still filing today
83%
71%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWISCONSIN VETERANS VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +67%
- SPSAVING PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +153%
- CCCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- AHANDERSON HUMANEone grant, 2024 · $2k
- SJST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +33%
- O4OUTFITTERS 4 HOPEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Hope Safehouse Inc
Care of stray and homeless animals
Animals
2
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County
Construction of homes and provide financial opportunity to low income families to own them.
—
3
Feeding Wisconsin Inc
Our vision is a hunger-free wisconsin and our mission is to help our food banks and partners fight hunger, improve health and strengthen local communities so that everybody in wisconsin has access to the food and benefits they need to…
Food & Nutrition
4
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
—
5
Baraboo Area Homeless Shelter
Works to provide shelter and comprehensive case management services to persons experiencing homelessness in baraboo, wi and the surrounding area.
Housing & Shelter
6
Wisconsin Hero Outdoors Inc
Connect veterans, first responders and their families to integrated nature based outdoor therapies.
—
7
Dodge County Humane Society Inc
Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.
Animals
8
Women and Children's Horizons Inc
The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.
Human Services
9
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc
Working to further restoration and conservation of wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources.
Environment
10
Oconto Area Humane Society & Animal Shelter Inc
Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals
Animals
11
Help of Door County Inc
Working with victims of domestic violence and providing supervised visitation and exchanges for children and non custodial parent
Health
12
The Haven of Manitowoc County Inc
The haven's mission is to advocate for homeless men while providing community resources and an interfaith approach towards self-sufficiency.
Housing & Shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cots Inc and the most unlike its peers is Outfitters 4 Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$13,300Human Services$7,500Housing & Shelter$5,800Animals$4,500Employment$4,400Food & Nutrition$2,250Health$2,250
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEAVEN ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN VETERANS VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds OUTFITTERS 4 HOPE ↗
- Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COTS ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HORTONVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation for the Fox ValleyWI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Geoff and Kelly Crowley Family · Fox Cities Amateur Sports Authority Corp · Myra M and Robert L Vandehey · Hartwig Family Foundation Inc · The William J and Barbara a Schmidt · Mercy Works Foundation · Robert & Susan Brown Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OGILVIE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OUTFITTERS 4 HOPE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 883478595 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on OUTFITTERS 4 HOPE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Ogilvie Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ogilvie Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines