· Private foundation
Ogilvie Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS | $1,500 |
| BELONG FOX VALLEY | $1,500 |
| SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY | $1,500 |
| FOX CITIES VICTIM CRISIS RESPONSE TEAM | $1,500 |
| LEAVEN | $1,500 |
| COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET | $1,500 |
| BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS | $1,500 |
| WISCONSIN VETERANS VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC | $1,500 |
| LAKESHORE CHARITIES INC | $750 |
| HORTONVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LILEAVEN INC3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +46%
- HHHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +2%
- WVWISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INCone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
- WMWOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +27%
- AAANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTERone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care of stray and homeless animals
Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals
Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.
The Humane Society of Waupaca County (HSWC) provides the following services for the citizens of Waupaca County and the surrounding area. HSWC provides shelter, veterinary care, spaying and neutering and adoption services for homeless pets.
Baraboo area homeless shelter works to provide shelter and comprehensive case management services to persons experiencing homelessness in baraboo, wisconsin and the surrounding area.
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.
Promote humane treatment of companion animals and provide care and shelter while waiting to be rehomed
Our mission is to empower WI Habitat for Humanity affiliates to create one voice that advocates and influences affordable home ownership.
Helping families and individuals experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence.
The Housing Action Coalition brings together community resources to address the needs of Waukesha Countys most vulnerable people. The Coalition assists those in need of emergency housing, financial assistance, food and many other…
The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Outfitters 4 Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds SAVING PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
- Who funds Outfitters 4 Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds COTS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HORTONVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Geoff and Kelly Crowley Family Foundation Inc · Myra M and Robert L Vandehey Foundation Ltd · Hartwig Family Foundation Inc · The Robert and Susan Brown Family Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ogilvie Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.