Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oechsle Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Health$3.4MPhilanthropy$2.7MHuman Services$2.2MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.3MInternational$785kRecreation & Sports$715kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $600k
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $2.7M
$50,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN$205,000
FOUNDATION FOR METROWEST INC$180,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$125,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN$125,000
NEW REACH INC$110,000
POLITICAL ASYLUM IMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJEC$100,000
THE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC$100,000
HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC$100,000
NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$100,000
NEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC$100,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100,000
ALL OUR KIN INC$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$100,000
HOPE AND COMFORT INC$100,000
INTEGRATED REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES INC$90,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH HILL COMMUNITIES INC: $10k → 7%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $23k → 11%FII - NATIONAL: $70k → 10%BLACK OUTSIDE INC: $30k → 16%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $40k → 11%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $100k → 7%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $100k → 7%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $45k → 15%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $100k → 7%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $40k → 15%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $100k → 7%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $30k → 15%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $90k → 7%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $30k → 15%HOPE AND COMFORT INC: $75k → 7%LA COLABORATIVA INC: $30k → 16%PROJECT HOPE BOSTON INC: $30k → 16%VINFEN CORPORATION: $75k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $100k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $100k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $75k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $75k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
AZ
KS
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Oechsle Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Oechsle Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 43 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
12

Total granted

$12M
$453k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-13%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $560k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $840k · revenue +52%
  • Northwestern University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $675k · revenue +34%
  • NR
    NEW REACH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $660k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • VINFEN CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +65%
  • FII - NATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +5%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
3
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
10
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
11
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
12
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nurse-Family Partnership and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Youth CampsImmigrant Worker SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/71
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/71
Grantees still filing
36/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $600,000 · OtherNEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $580,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $550,000 · OtherWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INCINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES — $350,000 · OtherINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICESSTART EARLY — $270,000 · OtherA Place To Turn Inc — $215,000 · OtherNEW REACH INC — $660,000 · OtherNEW REACH INCGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC) — $375,000 · OtherGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND…POLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC — $395,000 · OtherPOLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION P…ROCA INC — $275,000 · Other+22 more — $1,816,000 · Other+22 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN — $1,490,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUN…Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — $1,070,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundati…+1 more — $34,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC — $840,000 · HealthTHE PARMENTER F…NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $390,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PA…LENNY LEARNING INC — $375,000 · HealthLENNY LEARNING …PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $170,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $75,000 · Health+9 more — $283,000 · Health+9 moreCOLD SPRING SCHOOL INC — $610,000 · EducationCOLD SPRING SC…ALL OUR KIN INC — $540,000 · EducationALL OUR KIN IN…Youth Guidance — $250,000 · EducationYouth GuidanceCONCEPTS FOR ADAPTIVE LEARNING — $240,000 · EducationCONCEPTS FOR A…HIGHER HEIGHTS YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $155,000 · EducationHIGHER HEIGHTS…+5 more — $165,000 · Education+5 moreHOPE AND COMFORT INC — $565,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AND C…HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC — $350,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF…ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE — $145,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE F…VINFEN CORPORATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesVINFEN COR…FII - NATIONAL — $70,000 · Human Services+6 more — $173,000 · Human Services+6 moreNorthwestern University — $675,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsInternational Rescue Committee INC — $377,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE — $150,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $108,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $25,000 · International
Other$6,086,000Philanthropy$2,594,000Health$2,133,000Education$1,960,000Human Services$1,378,000Recreation & Sports$715,000International$710,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN — $1,490,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc — $1,070,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetTHE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC — $840,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetNorthwestern University — $675,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW REACH INC — $660,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOLD SPRING SCHOOL INC — $610,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetNEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $600,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE AND COMFORT INC — $565,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $550,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC — $540,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetPOLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC — $395,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $390,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $377,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC) — $375,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetLENNY LEARNING INC — $375,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC — $350,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES — $350,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROCA INC — $275,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSTART EARLY — $270,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Guidance — $250,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONCEPTS FOR ADAPTIVE LEARNING — $240,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetA Place To Turn Inc — $215,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetFEAST Inc — $180,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC — $155,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHIGHER HEIGHTS YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $155,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE — $145,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $140,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION — $110,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $108,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC — $92,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Harlem Environmental Action Inc — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION — $84,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVINFEN CORPORATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFII - NATIONAL — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE — $68,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHAIRTOSTAY — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSATONIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCHASE BJORK FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC — $46,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundatio…The Community Foundat…Yale UniversityEthel & Abe Lapides F…United Way of Greater…Liberty Bank Foundati…William Caspar Graust…Eastern Bank Foundati…Boston Foundation IncArbella Insurance Fou…Fairfield County's Co…The Daniel & Sharon M…
Newalliance Foundation IncCT28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Yale University · Ethel & Abe Lapides Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Daniel & Sharon Milikowsky Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oechsle Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Vinfen Corporation — 83% of income from government
  • Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
  • The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
  • New Reach Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Our Piece of the Pie Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Project Hope Boston Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc) — 11% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Music School Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven — 2% of income from government
  • New Haven Legal Assistance Association Inc — 2% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Hope and Comfort Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Middlesex Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines