Skip to content

· Private foundation

Odell Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$138kRecreation & Sports$43kReligion$14kEnvironment$8kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$2kInternational$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$836k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Westmont College$50,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
The New Horizons Foundation$5,000
Partners in Education$5,000
Eastern Sierra Running LLC$2,500
Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse$1,500
San Marcos High School$1,166
Dos Pueblos High School$1,166
Santa Barbara High School$1,166
Standing Together$1,000
Trail Runners for Public Lands$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Trail Runners for Public Lands: $250 → 10%Concordia University Irvine: $7k → 10%Eastern Sierra Running LLC: $3k → 10%Los Angeles Bible Training School: $3k → 14%Dos Pueblos High School: $2k → 14%Santa Barbara FCA: $1k → 15%Standing Together: $1k → 8%The New Horizons Foundation: $5k → 9%Eastern Sierra Running LLC: $3k → 10%Preparing for a Degree: $3k → 14%Dos Pueblos High School: $2k → 14%Eastern Sierra Running LLC: $3k → 10%Dos Pueblos High School: $1k → 14%Partners in Education: $5k → 14%Partners in Education: $5k → 14%San Marcos High School: $2k → 14%San Marcos High School: $1k → 14%Westmont College: $50k → 14%Westmont College: $35k → 14%Westmont College Athletics: $25k → 14%Building Warriors Basketball: $12k → 14%Westmont College: $11k → 14%Westmont College Athletics: $10k → 14%Montecito Covenant Church: $10k → 14%Westmont College Athletics: $4k → 14%Santa Barbara City College: $200 → 14%Cold Springs School Foundation: $1k → 14%Santa Barbara High School: $2k → 14%Santa Barbara High School: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 8 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$164k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+8%

Still filing today

13%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESTMONT COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2025 · $96k · revenue +14%
  • WC
    Westmont College Athletics
    3× · 2021–2023 · $40k
  • PI
    Partners in Education
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTECITO COVENANT CHURCH SANTA BARBARA CA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +3%
  • PF
    Preparing for a Degree
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Westmont College Foundation

To provide and develop community relations and financial support in concert with and toward fulfillment of the vision and mission of Westmont College

—
2
Cornerstone College & Seminary

Teaching Bible Students

Education
3
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
4
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
5
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
6
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
7
The Cornerstone Bible College and Seminary

The training of men and women for ministry in local churches. Specifically, providing a Bachelor's Degree or Certificate of Accomplishment designating the completion of course material required. Also, the rewarding of a Master's Degree…

Education
8
Southern California School of Theology

Theology Grad School Offering Interfaith and Ecumenical Degree Programs, MDIV, MA, DMIN and PHD.

Education
9
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
10
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
11
Santa Barbara County Trails Council

Our mission is to protect public trail access build and maintain safe and sustainable trails and promote public engagement in land stewardship and trail use for all types of outdoor recreation.

Recreation & Sports
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University Irvine; the most unlike its peers is Runners for Public Lands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTMONT COLLEGE: $95,500 · EducationWESTMONT COLLEGECONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $7,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWestmont College Athletics: $39,820 · OtherWestmont College AthleticsIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPartners in Education: $10,000 · OtherPartners in EducationMONTECITO COVENANT CHURCH SANTA BARBARA CA: $10,000 · OtherMONTECITO COVENANT CHURCH SANTA BARBARA CAEastern Sierra Running LLC: $7,500 · OtherEastern Sierra Running LLCDos Pueblos High School: $4,795 · Other+9 more: $15,032 · Other+9 moreThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,500 · HealthSTANDING TOGETHER INC: $1,000 · ReligionWORLD VISION INC: $500 · InternationalRUNNERS FOR PUBLIC LANDS: $250 · Environment
Education$103,500Other$99,147Philanthropy$5,000Health$1,500Religion$1,000International$500Environment$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE: $95,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Bible Training School: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMONTECITO TRAILS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANDING TOGETHER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCold Spring School Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUNNERS FOR PUBLIC LANDS: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Bible Training School ↗
  • Who funds MONTECITO TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Council on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse ↗
  • Who funds STANDING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds Cold Spring School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUNNERS FOR PUBLIC LANDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Odell Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Odell Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Odell Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Odell Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Odell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph