How much did ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC grant in FY2024?

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC reported 15 grants totaling $338,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC based?

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC is based in NY.

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC

To make, establish, solicit, collect, receive, hold, invest, reinvest, distribute and disburse donations, subscriptions, gifts, bequests, scholarships, grants and other funds to support individuals, programs and/or services committed to the enhancement of community and civic endeavors consistent with the tenets of the independent order…

$338k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$65k

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$783kPhilanthropy$670kEducation$423kHousing & Shelter$244kRecreation & Sports$90kFood & Nutrition$75kCommunity Improvement$67kCrime & Legal$59kOther$1.3M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

livingtransport elderlycarepurchase

2020

staff trainingliftsdigitaltransportelderlyspecialchildren

2021

disabilitiesstoragefreezercampcontainersall-inclusiveaid

2022

utilitydisabledaccessibilitycomfortveteranspurchasecare

2023

educational scholarshipfarnhamfood pantryambulance

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $23k
$10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$50k–250k4 grants · $215k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

KALEIDA HEALTH FOUNDATION$65,000
HOMELESS SOLUTIONS (REMEDIES) INC$50,000
THE RURAL OUTREACH CENTER INC$50,000
BEYOND SUPPORT NETWORK OF WNY$50,000
PAIGE'S BUTTERFLY RUN INC$25,000
VICTORY HILL THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP$25,000
COMMUNITY MISSIONS OF NIAGARA FRONTIER INC$20,000
MARGARET HOME INC$20,000
WESTON T HYDE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
VILLAGE ENGAGED INC$6,000
TRINITY FREWSBURG CHURCH$6,000
WE'VE ALL SKIN THERE INC$5,000
PARENTS OF SPECIAL CHILDREN INC$3,000
ARCADE FOOD PANTRY-PIONEER CHURCHES$2,000
VASSAR COLLEGE$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $783k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.7M · 17 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.7M

$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

Still filing today

94%

66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $337k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DC
DAEMEN COLLEGE
2× · 2019–2023 · $303k · revenue +23%
UC
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF ROCHESTER
2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +12%
NL
NIAGARA LUTHERAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +112%

Funded once

BO
BROTHERS OF MERCY
one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue -30%
SA
ST ANN'S COMMUNITY
one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +18%
CF
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SCNYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +158%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Home of Central New York Senior

To assure maximum independence and dignity for residents, with a broad range of health, residential, and community services

Housing & Shelter

Schofield Home Health Care Services Inc

To provide the highest level of professional and paraprofessional home health care services with care, compassion, and allowing patients to remain in their own home. We meet our mission by operating a licensed home care agency providing…

—

Central New York Ronald McDonald House

Housing and programs for sick children and their families

—

Schoellkopf Health Center Inc

Skilled nursing facility providing long-term care to residents

Health

Canandaigua Comfort Care Home Inc

To provide a private home for individuals who are in the last few months of their lives.

Health

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Hebrew Health Care Inc

Provision of exceptional health care & aging services tailored to each individual.

Health

Sarah's Guest House Inc

This healthcare hospitality house provides a "home away from home" accomodations to patients and families of patients who are receiving medical care in central new york.

Human Services

Springside At Seneca Hill Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc., the sole member of Springside at Seneca Hill, Inc., is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health

Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services

Lutheran Church Home of Buffalo Inc

Our mission is to provide for the physical, social, and spiritual needs of individuals we serve, in a Christian environment. The organization is an adult care facility which can accommodate 48 residents.

Human Services

Carefirst Ny Inc

Affirming life through extraordinary, compassionate support and care.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Cerebral Palsy Association of the and the most unlike its peers is Vassar College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1.0%1/103

the rest of the field

1,623/21,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

89 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

85/89

Grantees still filing

68/89

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,233,200Other$1,520,814Human Services$783,200Philanthropy$670,000Education$423,000Housing & Shelter$244,154Recreation & Sports$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater BuffaloNY70.9× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo · The John R Oishei Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Feedmore Western New York Inc · East Hill Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · The Peter and Elizabeth C Tower · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · James H Cummings Foundation Inc · Grigg-Lewis Foundation Inc · First Niagara Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HIS HAVEN INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833770192 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HIS HAVEN INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Odd Fellow & Rebekah Benefit Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Odd Fellow & Rebekah Benefit Fund Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

89 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Odd Fellow & Rebekah Benefit Fund Inc?

More from the funding graph

ODD FELLOW & REBEKAH BENEFIT FUND INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

89 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Odd Fellow & Rebekah Benefit Fund Inc?

More from the funding graph