Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oakmont Family Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$587kPublic Safety & Disaster$183kHousing & Shelter$63kHealth$49kReligion$20kFood & Nutrition$18kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$808Other$0
02FY2021 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k16 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$600
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILIES FORWARD$13,594
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY$13,594
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,400
Individual grant recipient$740
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$600
J PAGGAO$600
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY: $14k → 10%FAMILIES FORWARD: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$193k · 90 repeat orgs$788k to everyone else

90 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 87 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
808

Total granted

$193k
$748k

Still filing today

0%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • SR
    SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Polytechnic State University

The foundation's purpose is to operate as an auxiliary organization of the california state university by supporting the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california polytechnic state university, san luis obispo.

Education
2
University of California

To raise and manage private funds to support uci's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service.

Education
3
California State University Fresno

Student Services California State University, Fresno

Education
4
California State University Fresno

The auxiliary organization was formed to operate and manage division i intercollegiate athletic programs at california state university, fresno.

5
California State University

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education
6
The University Corporation San

University corporation serves as an auxiliary organization of san francisco state university.

Education
7
California State University Dominguez

The organization's primary purpose is to assist csu, dominguez hills in various activities.

8
Saint Mary's College of California

An institution of higher education that grants associate, baccalaureate, and masters degrees in liberal arts, science, business administration and education, as well as a doctorate in education.

Education
9
Student Union of San Jose

To provide services to the students attending san jose state university (sjsu).

Education
10
Seattle Pacific University

Seattle Pacific University is a Christian university fully committed to engaging the culture and changing the world by graduating people of competence and character, becoming people of wisdom, and modeling grace-filled community.

Education
11
Saint Francis University

Non-profit educational institution located in loretto, pennsylvania.

Education
12
Azusa Pacific University

To advance the work of God in the world through academic excellence in higher education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Jose State University and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco State University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 913 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+198 more — $491,775 · Other+198 moreSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $13,594 · Food & NutritionSIMPSON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · Education
Other$491,775Food & Nutrition$13,594Education$2,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $13,594 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $13,594 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mario Pedrozzi Scholarship FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation · Foundation for California Community Colleges · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oakmont Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oakmont Family Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Oakmont Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 913 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph