· Public charity
Oakland Warthogs Youth Rugby Program Inc
The organization facilitiates youth rugby practice and events as well as, fostering community service opportunities for players and coaches.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $82,542 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $180,681 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $98,139 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Inner City Rugby of Nashville | $17,500 |
| Memphis Inner City Rugby | $10,000 |
| Guardian Gym | $10,000 |
| James Joseph Foundation | $10,000 |
| ICEF Rugby | $10,000 |
| Olympic Club Foundation | $10,000 |
| City Team Ministries - Oakland | $5,042 |
| US Rugby Foundation | $5,000 |
| Women for Rugby | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To develop and administer the sport of rugby in the united states to the highest international standards and to represent the interests of the united states in the world rugby community.
None
Iyrf manages the operation of youth rugby in the state of indiana including the collection of grants, donations, and player fees. iyrf schedules matches and conducts state playoffs for boys & girls teams.
The sfgg rugby foundation is organized exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes, more specifically to organize, supervise, administer, evaluate and modify, when appropriate the athletic program for the community of…
To support, promote, develop and grow the sport of rugby at all levels in the united states by providing financial support to usa rugby.
We are an alumni based charity foundation formed to support the varsity rugby team at California State University Long Beach and its players students to provide them an opportunity of success during their time at the school and with the…
To govern youth and high school rugby in Southern California, including organizing and running league competitions and tournaments, promoting the continued growth of the game through outreach and education, and prioritizing the safety and…
Sponsorship and promotion of amateur rugby.
To promote amateur rugby football throughout the u.s. by making grants to organizations and individuals supporting the usrff goals and by sponsoring programs that encourage the development of youth rugby.
Silicon Valley Rugby Football Club SVRFC is rugby program based in San Jose California and the surrounding areas. SVRFC's stated mission is encourage and grow the sport of rugby in the Silicon Valley and surrounding areas. SVRFC was…
Madison united rugby supports and develops amateur athletes for national and international amateur competition in the sport of rugby. to advance the primary purpose, madison united rugby will coordinate and develop rugby related endeavors…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olympic Club Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Taco Jitsu Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oakland Warthogs Youth Rugby Program Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.